Submission declined on 1 February 2023 by KylieTastic (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 29 January 2023 by Gene93k (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Gene93k 15 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 6 January 2023 by Bilorv (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Bilorv 16 months ago.
| |
Comment: No improvement in independent reliable source coverage since last decline. In fact, all but one of the independent references have been removed, while new content is sourced to the company. • Gene93k (talk) 11:19, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Of the six secondary sources, three (Vice, The Verge, VentureBeat) are mentions in passing, Image is not entirely about Ko-fi, and The Week and ReviewGeek perhaps contribute towards notability but wouldn't get us there.See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ko-fi, where The Week and the Image sources in particular were available but the consensus was that the topic was non-notable. — Bilorv (talk) 21:33, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Type of site | Crowdfunding donations platform |
|---|---|
| Available in | English |
| Owner | Ko-fi Labs Ltd. |
| Created by | Nigel Pickles, Simon Ellington |
| URL | ko-fi |
| Commercial | Yes |
| Registration | Optional |
| Users | 1,000,000+ |
| Launched | May 18, 2011[1] |
| Current status | 5479  Online[2] |
Ko-fi is a crowdfunding platform allowing users to donate small amounts of money, primarily to content creators. Ko-fi does not process any payments by itself, but instead uses services like PayPal and Stripe.
History edit
Ko-fi.com's domain name was registered on May 15, 2011. The company announced it live on Twitter two days later. It started as a simple button link generator, where users entered a name and a PayPal email address, and donors could enter their name and a message. Donors' names and messages were then posted on Twitter as a promotion.
Ko-fi was fully rebranded in 2017 in helping creators facilitate in making their first one dollar on their platform.[3]
Business model edit
Ko-fi allows direct donations, monthly subscriptions and commissions to support registered users in what they do. Ko-fi does not take fees with the exception of the 5% fee for building membership, shop, and commission.[4]
While Ko-fi's blog system is generally free to the public, creators can paywall their content to be viewed for members only.
Ko-fi also has a subscription service called Ko-fi Gold. This subscription removes all fees, allows posting of exclusive content, obtain a Gold badge, and other benefits at the cost of $6 per month in an annual subscription.[5]
See also edit
References edit
- ^ "Ko-fi on Twitter". Twitter. 2011-05-18. Archived from the original on January 10, 2014.
- ^ "Similarweb Rating". Retrieved 11 February 2023.
- ^ "Ko-fi Review: Audience Monetization Platform for Creators". Retrieved 1 February 2023.
- ^ "Buy Me A Coffee Vs Ko-Fi: Which Is Better To Add To A Blog?". Retrieved 1 February 2023.
- ^ "Buy Me A Coffee Vs Ko-Fi: Which Is Better To Add To A Blog?". Retrieved 1 February 2023.
External links edit
Crowdfunding platforms | |
|---|---|
| Africa & West Asia | |
| Americas |
|
| Asia-Pacific | |
| Europe | |
| Defunct |
|
Category:Crowdfunding platforms Category:Internet properties established in 2011
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.