 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,606 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
| Submission declined on 25 April 2024 by ToadetteEdit (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 23 April 2024 by S0091 (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
| |
| Submission declined on 23 April 2024 by MicrobiologyMarcus (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. | |
| Submission declined on 23 April 2024 by MicrobiologyMarcus (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
| |
| Submission declined on 23 April 2024 by KylieTastic (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
| |
Comment: Resubmitting without improvement is disruptive. The Guardian article might have enough independent content to pass but the other two are interviews/what Cumming's says which are primary sources and not independent so cannot be used to establish notability. S0091 (talk) 17:12, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment:
I have reformatted your references correctly(Update: since reverted by author) so that they may be placed inline around supporting material. Note that each of these are not independent and therefore do not establish notability. So for future references, follow the instructions at WP:REFB so that they will be formatted similarly. Further, the article must be written in descriptive encyclopedic prose and not promotional in nature. microbiologyMarcus [petri dish·growths] 14:39, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: See WP:REFB for help with references and WP:NTV to see what it takes to establish WP:Notability for television series. microbiologyMarcus [petri dish·growths] 12:43, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
 | A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. (April 2024) |
Canal Boat Diaries is a British television series in which the narrowboat enthusiast and liveaboard boater Robbie Cumming explores the canals and rivers of the UK and features day to day life onboard his narrowboat home The Naughty Lass.[1][2]
The first four series of Canal Boat Diaries[3] were originally half hour episodes which aired on BBC Four[4] and BBC One before transferring to UKTV Yesterday.[5] Series 5 was commissioned by UKTV Yesterday and takes the format of 60 minutes episodes.
The concept was created by series producer Stuart Woodman, executive producer Tony Parker and presenter Robbie Cumming.[6]
References edit
- ^ Yorkshire Post. "Canal Boat Diaries: The TV programme shedding light on Yorkshire's hidden waterways". Yorkshire Post / Yorkshire Life.
- ^ Guardian. "Thrills and Spills at 4mph: Return of Canal Boat Diaries". Guardian. Retrieved 10 March 2022.
- ^ Nottinghamshire Live. "BBC 4 Canal Boat Diaries star nearly runs aground in 'tidal' River Trent". Nottinghamshire Live / Nottingham Post. Retrieved 30 April 2023.
- ^ Telegraph & Argus. "BBC Four's Canal Boat Diaries visits Bingley Five Rise Locks". Telegraph & Argus. Retrieved 16 March 2022.
- ^ "Canal Boat Diaries: How do you rescue a grounded narrowboat?". bbc.co.uk. 21 November 2019.
- ^ "Robbie Cumming: 'I bought Naughty Lass for £22,000 and I've been travelling the nation's waterways ever since'". The Times.