Worcestershire was a county constituency of the House of Commons of the Parliament of England then of the Parliament of Great Britain from 1707 to 1800 and of the Parliament of the United Kingdom from 1801 to 1832. It was represented until 1832 by two Members of Parliament traditionally referred to as Knights of the Shire. It was split then into two two-member divisions, for Parliamentary purposes, Worcestershire Eastern and Worcestershire Western constituencies.
Worcestershire | |
---|---|
Former county constituency for the House of Commons | |
1290–1832 | |
Seats | two |
Boundaries
editWorcestershire was one of the historic counties of England. The constituency comprised the whole county, except for the boroughs of Bewdley, Droitwich, Evesham and Worcester.
Members of Parliament
edit1294–1478
editSource: Treadway Russell Nash.[2]
1479–1552
editParliament | First member | Second member |
---|---|---|
1510-1532 | Not known | |
1529 | Sir Gilbert Talbot | John Russell |
1536 | Not known | |
1539 (30 Henry VIII) | Sir John Russell | Sir John Pakington |
1542 (33 Henry VIII) | Sir Gilbert Talbot, died and replaced by Thomas Russell |
William Sheldon |
1547 | Thomas Russell | William Sheldon |
1553–1649
editSource: TR Nash[2]
Commonwealth Parliaments
edit!Year | First Member | Second Member | Third Member | Fourth Member | Fifth Member |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1653 | Richard Salwey | John James | |||
1654 | Sir Thomas Rouse, Bt | Edward Pytts | Nicholas Lechmere | John Bridges | Talbot Badger |
1656 | Col. James Berry | Edward Pytts | Nicholas Lechmere | Sir Thomas Rouse, Bt | John Nanfan |
1658-9 | Nicholas Lechmere | Thomas Foley |
Source: T. R. Nash, Collections for a History of Worcestershire (1783)
MPs 1660–1832
editElections
editThe county franchise, from 1430, was held by the owners of freehold land valued at 40 shillings or more. Each voter had as many votes as there were seats to be filled. Votes had to be cast by a spoken declaration, in public, at the hustings, which took place in the county town of Worcester. The expense and difficulty of voting at only one location in the county, together with the lack of a secret ballot contributed to the corruption and intimidation of voters, which was widespread in the unreformed British political system.
The expense, to candidates, of contested elections encouraged the leading families of the county to agree on the candidates to be returned unopposed whenever possible. Contested county elections were therefore unusual.
See also
editReferences
edit- ^ a b "Worcestershire - History of Parliament Online". Retrieved 14 April 2017.
- ^ a b Treadway Russell Nash, Collections for a History of Worcestershire (1783)