Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/News/December 2022/Review essay

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Indy beetle
  • @Nick-D: Perhaps my memory fails me, but when I read White I didn't get the impression that "Rhodesia was always doomed", just that they had a much weaker hand than they were bluffing to the local white community and the international community. She wrote, "while Rhodesian soldiers were not routed anywhere, they did not win any decisive victories either, especially during the mid-1970s when guerrilla forces were in disarray. In terms of strategy in the middle and late 1970s, it is not altogether clear that the Rhodesian state wanted victory more than it wanted a strong position from which to negotiate some kind of transition to majority rule." This makes it seem like Rhodesia's failures were committed during the course of the war, not written by fate at the onset. Regardless, I agree it is is a very good book, and it's one of those kinds of books that makes you question almost all of how an entire subject is represented on Wikipedia. -Indy beetle (talk) 16:04, 9 December 2022 (UTC)Reply