Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Coordinators/September 2009
Question edit
Assuming I run again (and that's not certain at the moment) will there be any objections if I don;t get particularly active here until December? I do not want to unnecessarily hog a spot that could better go to someone else in this election, hence the question. (Be forewarned: more questions may follow). TomStar81 (Talk) 06:02, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
So many good candidates! edit
Well, I hate to seem indiscriminate with having supported practically everyone, so I just want to confirm that yes I did read everyone's userpages, block logs, checked our intersecting contributions, etc. and still thought enough to support like a dozen or so candidates in this election. I was tempted to write a paragraph for each like I do at RfAs, such as my support here, but as no one else seems to be doing that, unlike with the RfAs, I did not want to deviate from the norm (unless if anyone wants me to elaborate, I will gladly do so), but anyway, this slate of candidates includes many editors with no blocks, who are already admins, who have extensive amounts of barnstars, featured, good, article credits, etc. I am supremely pleased to see such a good selection of editors and commend them for all their constructive edits to improve are project and for having worked well enough with our community to receive such enthusiastic support from our colleagues. Kudos to everyone I have supported! I only have a handful more to review (I usually do that off-wiki for a good 20 minutes per candidate and then comment), but I am incredibly pleased and satisfied with what I have seen thus far. I hope everyone is having a wonderful weekend! Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 16:04, 20 September 2009 (UTC)