Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Logic/New articles

The Enemies of Reason

The television series is merely a proposed project, subject to existing WP guidelines on things in the future(WP:FUTURE#Wikipedia is not a crystal_ball). Also, there is little documentation to verify article content except the producer's promotional literature, so it appears to be advertising (WP:SPAM). Inclusion is premature until it airs, and inclusion will be helped by availability of published reviews for reference and citation. I did very much like Dawson in Hogan's Heroes. Hotfeba 17:32, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Herrmann Brain Dominance Instrument

No sure how this article on a psychological testing instrument fall under this project. Term logical does appear in the article, but besides the listing of qualities, there is no explanation of relevance and little of note for philosophy/logic inclusion. Hotfeba 19:10, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

That's why it's just "for consideration." If you sift through the list that the bot makes, there really are only a few at a time that are close. At this stage it is better to be inclusive. Being in this list doesn't even imply that it belongs in WikiProject Logic. These are just close, and therefore may benefit from this group's attention. Gregbard 01:12, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Understood. My comments are only of record, and only of the most questionable (at least to me) items listed, to show that someone was paying attention. Others are free to edit the named articles, so that inclusion appears more reasonable. Hotfeba 19:19, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Scope

Are any of the new articles on this page actually logic articles? — Charles Stewart (talk) 06:08, 12 June 2009 (UTC)