Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Blitzes/October 2020

Months changed

Baffle gab1978, I hope you don't mind that I removed September from the list of months. I think 150+ articles is plenty of choice for a blitz, and we might as well focus on the oldest tags. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:35, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

July and August only sounds good to me. In the unlikely event that we clear out both months, we can always add September. Cheers, Tdslk (talk) 23:20, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

No worries; at least all of those are checked, unless more tags have been added or reverted. September is now checked to the end of K. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 04:20, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Brand valuation

Had a look at this one. It is tagged needing rewriting, copyedit, may not reflect encyclopedic tone, needs attention from an expert (all from July 2020), and more citations needed (December 2012).

I've added in a bit more content and some more citations. It actually doesn't look to me (and didn't before I had a go at it) as if it needs copyediting or has tone issues. Am I missing something? I can't speak to whether it still needs attention from an expert, though it certainly wouldn't hurt. There are still some areas of missing citation.

If others agree, I'd like to remove the needing rewriting, copyedit and encyclopedic tone tags. Thanks, Tacyarg (talk) 22:31, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

A good example of tag-bombing. I didn't read through the article to see if it needs copyediting; my default position is that everything that's tagged does . {{Tone}} means "make it read like an encyclopedia article". Thanks for your help and all the best, Miniapolis 22:55, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Adding GOCEreviewed template?

I fixed everything I could that required copyediting on Dulhan Ganga Paar Ke, but while trying to find information on the film, I realized that there were lots of issues that were outside the scope of copyediting, as well as some issues regarding the movie meeting notability guidelines. I added the notability template (as well as some relevant inline cleanup templates), but should I add a GOCEreviewed template as well because I technically couldn't finish fixing the article? Voxinsocks (talk) 01:41, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

You can if you want, but it's optional. Your edit summary saying that you copy edited as much as possible, and that you added relevant tags, should suffice. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:36, 20 October 2020 (UTC)