Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Gender studies/Assessment

This page is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this page, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles

NA

This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : see Unassessed Gender studies articles and Unknown-importance Gender studies articles
Cleanup : edit to see
Collaborate : see /Collaboration
Copyedit : edit to see
Deletion sorting : see /Sexuality and gender
Expand : edit to see
Infobox : see Gender studies articles needing infoboxes
Merge : edit to see
Notability : edit to see
NPOV : edit to see
Orphans : Brannon Masculinity Scale · Domestic violence in lesbian relationships · Holy Virility · Media and gender · Michael Kaufman (author) · Women's education in Saudi Arabia
Photo : see Wikipedia requested photographs of gender studies
Split : History of feminism
Stubs : see Gender studies stubs
Translate : see /translation
Update : edit to see
Verify : Riot grrrl
Needs attention : see Gender studies articles needing attention

I'm interested in Women's rights in Saudi Arabia. I made a request for feedback at the Saudi Arabia page [1], but I can't find a similar device here. How can I get some input from people interested in gender studies? Noloop (talk) 17:04, 5 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Example articles are linked to current versions edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I'm not a member of the project, but I noticed that the links for example articles are to current versions rather than specific revisions. Apparently it was changed in this edit when the example articles were changed. This can cause problems as time passes and articles are edited. It's possible that an article listed as an example for a particular class might be greatly improved or damaged, and it would remain listed in its original, but now incorrect, class. Over a longer time, class standards may shift. I fixed the same problem for another (much smaller and quieter) project; this one has plenty of editors, and I'm sure someone here can take care of it. Cheers, BlackcurrantTea (talk) 23:05, 8 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic