Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Engineering/Archive 3
![]() | This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
This page is an Archive of the discussions from WikiProject Engineering talk page (Discussion page).
![]() |
---|
Hi; I placed your project template on this article because it has a lot of technical detail that needs pro attention, even though it's not part of this project's "guide to engineering". Still, it's a novel effort, the project, and "an engineering feat" so maybe of interest to the project. Gondolas are covered in British Columbia under the Railway Act (legislation) but WP:Trains didn't seem right and technical material isn't really WP:Ski's forte, nor WP:Canada's. If not suitable to your project pls remove, but maybe one or two of you might want to "adopt" it anyway. Note mass of article issues templates at top of page. Thanks.Skookum1 (talk) 01:03, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
GAR for Optical fiber
Optical fiber has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Articles are typically reviewed for one week. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here. --A. di M. (talk) 17:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Engineering traditions in Canada
Engineering traditions in Canada has been nominated for deletion. 76.66.196.229 (talk) 06:24, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Engineering standards
Engineering standards has been nominated for deletion. 76.66.196.229 (talk) 05:54, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Coordinators' working group
Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.
All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 05:21, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Everyone loves this, so I don't see why you guys wouldn't. Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 08:55, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- I see that there are not that many articles in your scope. Have you considered making a Bot request so a bot would tag all the articles in categories you deem engineering related? This would greatly improve the effectiveness of Article Alerts, if you choose to implement it.Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 08:57, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
This article, about an engineering term, was recently nominated for deletion; the result was no consensus. I would like to expand the article, but I'm finding it difficult to source information, hence I wondered if anyone within this project might have access to any further information.
The main objections to the article have been that it remains like a dictionary entry, because it contains only 1 reference to actualy usage of the term (in a book). Because the term is slang, and somewhat obscene, it's difficult to find further details.
I'd be very grateful if anyone could help improve the article.
Thanks. -- Chzz ► 09:26, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Logarithmically-spaced Dirac comb
Logarithmically-spaced Dirac comb has been prodded for deletion 76.66.193.69 (talk) 06:07, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Would someone like to assess this article for importance? I just wrote it, but I find the engineering importance scale pretty opaque and maybe someone with more experience here should do it. Gatoclass (talk) 13:24, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Analog and digital being redefined on wikipedia
From my limited understanding, everything is analog before it can be digital. There seems to be a backwards trend here. Digital is being treated as naturally occurring, while analog is being treated as having strict criteria, when in reality it should be the other way around. There is a dispute on the analog signal article where a couple of users have replaced referenced material with unreferenced material. Oicumayberight (talk) 16:06, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
I just noticed that the digital article has no sources either. One would expect a concept with such broad usage to have enough literature to source the article. Oicumayberight (talk) 18:56, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
I think I see the error in the logic. The reason why there isn't many sources (if any) to the way digital is being referred to on the wikipedia is because "digital" is being used to describe raw data and not data processing. First we have to understand that "digital" is meaningless if it doesn't pertain to information. All data in it's purest form is analog, and is only made digital by the way it's processed. The difference between analog data and digital data is the same difference between data and information. All information is data, but not all data is information. Therefore, data is only digital as it pertains to information, not raw data. It makes perfect sense when you see digital data as the subset of analog data that it is. But when you try to reverse it and treat analog data as if it merely intersects or is a subset of digital data, it's no wonder that it's vague and confusing. It's contrary to logic. Oicumayberight (talk) 19:37, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Massive edits/changes and questionable rename at PEAK 2 PEAK Gondola
Please see Talk:PEAK_2_PEAK_Gondola#Massive_changes_and_name-change_by_SPA.Skookum1 (talk) 01:49, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Plastic hinges and living hinges
I am wondering if one of you could look at plastic hinge and living hinge. I believe both articles are referring to the exact same thing, but living hinge seems limited while plastic hinge seems broad. I started a section on it at Talk:Living hinge. Have a nice day. Zab (talk) 04:55, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
Oil shale extraction
There is a plan to bring the Oil shale extraction article to FA status and renominate it for FAC. Any assistance, such as reviewing and editing, as also as any critical comment is appreciated. Beagel (talk) 10:57, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
IEEE Society on Social Implications of Technology
IEEE Society on Social Implications of Technology has been nominated for deletion. 70.29.210.130 (talk) 04:30, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks. I tried to address the notability concerns. Dr.K. logos 06:14, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.
If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none
parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.
Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.
Thanks. — Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 09:07, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)
Pageview stats
After a recent request, I added WikiProject Engineering to the list of projects to compile monthly pageview stats for. The data is the same used by http://stats.grok.se/en/ but the program is different, and includes the aggregate views from all redirects to each page. The stats are at Wikipedia:WikiProject Engineering/Popular pages.
The page will be updated monthly with new data. The edits aren't marked as bot edits, so they will show up in watchlists. You can view more results, request a new project be added to the list, or request a configuration change for this project using the toolserver tool. If you have any comments or suggestions, please let me know. Thanks! Mr.Z-man 01:09, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Spaghetti bridge
Hi engineers. I just made Spaghetti bridge and am looking for an image. Does anyone have an image or know where to get one? Thank you. --Anna Frodesiak (talk) 15:47, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
A deletion topic which requires engineering eyes
See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roark's Formulas for Stress and Strain - Seventh Edition. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 13:29, 28 December 2009 (UTC)