Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Beetles/Archive 2

New pages about Mastax

Hey guys, User:Jackson Cordeiro Brilhador has been creating a lot of new pages about beetles. Could one of you take a look at them, see if they check out? They could also use a bit of fleshing out as a whole. Thanks! --Hawks Discuss ^edits 17:57, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Notice to participants at this page about adminship

Many participants here create a lot of content, have to evaluate whether or not a subject is notable, decide if content complies with BLP policy, and much more. Well, these are just some of the skills considered at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship.

So, please consider taking a look at and watchlisting this page:

• Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Optional RfA candidate poll

You could be very helpful in evaluating potential candidates, and even finding out if you would be a suitable RfA candidate.

Many thanks and best wishes,

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:40, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Elmidae

Local news article in Arizona announced the extinction of a Beetle: [[1]]. I thought this was a significant fact that should be added somewhere, but the mostly likely place to put it is in Elmidae which is just a list of the family. There are no details about anything there. I'm guessing that the extinct beetle identified as "Stephan’s riffle beetle" in the news article is in fact Pseudancyronyx. Is it OK to start adding prose into the article? Or is there a better way to handle this? MB 04:06, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Yes start adding prose! All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 10:00, 6 January 2017 (UTC).

2016 Community Wishlist Survey Proposal to Revive Popular Pages

Greetings WikiProject Beetles/Archive 2 Members!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about a technical proposal to revive your Popular Pages list in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

• Fix and improve Mr.Z-bot's popular pages report

If the above proposal gets in the Top 10 based on the votes, there is a high likelihood of this bot being restored so your project will again see monthly updates of popular pages.

Further, there are over 260 proposals in all to review and vote for, across many aspects of wikis.

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 17:54, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Greetings & DYK

Howdy all. Just officially put my name down for this Wikiproject despite having already worked on bits of it. So Hi.

Thought I'd flag a WP:BEETLES DYK I just put up for nomination Template:Did you know nominations/Meloe variegatus as a welcome gift. Zakhx150 (talk) 13:41, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

• Also, I'll hopefully be working on the Tansy Beetle article - for anyone unfamiliar its a UK Nationally rare species. There is a lot of work being done on the conservation in York, UK, where I'm based and I'm familiar with some of the people involved in it. Going to ask for some additional resources/papers to build it up a bit. I've just updated and upgraded the WP class to 'Start'(Talk:Tansy beetle).Zakhx150 (talk) 20:53, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Genera required

Having been tagging hundreds of Chrysomelidae stubs as orphans using AWB, there appears to be a large number of article at species level which have no geneus to link to. Most of those I've come across in this overview relate to African species and all articles use a single list-based source 1. They are created by a single user with autopatrolled status; so the metadata/orphan flags hadn't been picked up as part of the New Page Patrol review. For future convenience, here is the (Link to Articles Created page of user in question). Any assistance gratefully received, but I'll plough on eventually anyway.Zakhx150 (talk) 22:26, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Being a pest

Howdy.

Partly because it's something I've been thinking about and partly as a way to gauge the level of current interest in the WP, I'm opening the floor to suggest an update of the WP userbox template. Please Assume good faith with this message, but I've been doing some updates to the project page . The one suggested below includes a logo of a Coccinellid rather than the line drawing of the current userbox, reasoning that ladybirds are one of the most recognisable beetles in the world. Colour, text size, other changes are available from all good high street stores.

Pinging the other five listed members of the WP who aren't actually blocked: @Daniel Mietchen: @Gug01: @Hectonichus: @Wilhelmina Will:@Mothman27:

{{userbox
| border-c = Black
| id       = [[File:Donacia-transparent.png|35px]]
| id-c     = white
| info     =  This user is a member of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Beetles|WikiProject Beetles]].
| info-c   = yellow
| usercategory  = WikiProject Beetles members
}}
{{clear}}
<noinclude>[[Category:WikiProject Beetles| ]]
[[Category:WikiProject Beetles members| ]]</noinclude>
{{userbox
| border-c = Black
| id       = [[File:Coccinelle.svg|35px]]
| id-c     = black
| info     =  This user is a member of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Beetles|WikiProject Beetles]].
| info-c   = white
| info-fc = black
| info-s = 9
| usercategory  = WikiProject Beetles members
}}
{{clear}}
<noinclude>[[Category:WikiProject Beetles| ]]
[[Category:WikiProject Beetles members| ]]</noinclude>

• For posterity - I'm taking it upon myself to make the change mentioned above. New userbox ahoy.Zakhx150 (talk) 16:17, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

GA Success

An important milestone has just been achieved - the article Beetle has just been promoted to Good Article Class! Huzzah. Thanks to any and all who had worked on it over its development, and to Shyamal for reviewing it. Zakhx150 (talk) 09:17, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Automatic taxoboxes

Members of WP Beetles, we are having a discussion over at WP Insects about whether we should recommend switching from taxoboxes to automatic taxoboxes to increase the maintainability of our large number of pages. We'd appreciate your input! M. A. Broussard (talk) 02:30, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Popular pages report

We – Community Tech – are happy to announce that the Popular pages bot is back up-and-running (after a one year hiatus)! You're receiving this message because your WikiProject or task force is signed up to receive the popular pages report. Every month, Community Tech bot will post at Wikipedia:WikiProject Beetles/Archive 2/Popular pages with a list of the most-viewed pages over the previous month that are within the scope of WikiProject Beetles.

We've made some enhancements to the original report. Here's what's new:

• The pageview data includes both desktop and mobile data.
• The report will include a link to the pageviews tool for each article, to dig deeper into any surprises or anomalies.
• The report will include the total pageviews for the entire project (including redirects).

We're grateful to Mr.Z-man for his original Mr.Z-bot, and we wish his bot a happy robot retirement. Just as before, we hope the popular pages reports will aid you in understanding the reach of WikiProject Beetles, and what articles may be deserving of more attention. If you have any questions or concerns please contact us at m:User talk:Community Tech bot.

Warm regards, the Community Tech Team 17:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)