Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomical objects
Main | Talk | Astronomical objects (Talk) | Eclipses (Talk) | Article ratings | Image review | Popular pages | Members | Wikidata |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WikiProject Astronomical objects page. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29Auto-archiving period: 60 days |
Astronomy: Astronomical objects Project‑class | ||||||||||
|
To-do list for Wikipedia:WikiProject Astronomical objects:
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Edit this box |
Project-independent quality assessments edit
"Hottest planet" listed at Redirects for discussion edit
The redirect Hottest planet has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 6 § Hottest planet until a consensus is reached. Thryduulf (talk) 14:23, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
List of minor planets: 624001–625000 nominated for deletion edit
@ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of minor planets: 624001–625000, the scope of which affects many of these list pages. ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 11:12, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
& @ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meanings of minor planet names: 623001–624000. ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 23:52, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Discussion on redesign of the Starbox edit
...is underway at Template talk:Starbox begin#Broader redesign of apparent-magnitude and color-index entries. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:20, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Splitting proposal edit
I propose we split articles on comets such as Halley's Comet or Comet Hale-Bopp into separate articles such as 1986 approach of Halley's Comet and 1997 approach of Comet Hale-Bopp. There are articles on the 2004 transit of Venus and the 2012 transit of Venus. That is why I think they should be split. DementiaGaming (talk) 23:22, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
- Halley's Comet § 1986 is six paragraphs long. I do not see a need to have a six-paragraph stub, nor do I think the existing article (at 100k) is so large that it needs to be split. Hale–Bopp's article is half that size and doesn't really have an "approach" section, making even less of a need to split. Primefac (talk) 11:34, 30 December 2023 (UTC)