Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants
This page is for requesting access to the AFC Helper script. If you wish to discuss this list, its requirements, or AFCH in general, do so at the main talk page.
Requests
- All archived requests older than one month can be found at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants/Old Requests.
- We generally do not notify users of acceptances, so check back often.
- Non-admins should refrain from closing reviews.
March
Inactive (Mar)
User:Jeromeenriquez
- Jeromeenriquez (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs (block • csd • prod) · afd)
- Reason for requesting afc helper script rights. i would like to help more as i have been inactive please make me active to bring more knowledge to the platform.thanks. Jeromeenriquez (talk) 18:35, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Name change (Mar)
- Codename Noreste (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs (block • csd • prod) · afd)
- Was renamed from 64andtim to Codename Noreste. Codename Noreste (talk) 10:09, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
User:Dilettante
- Dilettante (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs (block • csd • prod) · afd)
- I created this account as User:Novo Tape and was granted AFCH by Ingenuity but recently received a username change. I'm listed by my old name on the participants page. Would it be possible to replace that with my new username? Sincerely, Dilettante 16:13, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
New (Mar)
User:Antny08
- Hello, I am a Wikipedia user that is interested in helping others improve their articles. I am an extended-confirmed user, and have over 1000 edits on here (some I have deleted). I have created many articles on Wikipedia, and am looking to help others do the same thing. I have never had any action taken against me for violating any rules, because I have not violated any. As an AfC participant, I will use my knowledge of Wikipedia and my skill to accurately, unbiasedly, and efficiently help to review articles to help make Wikipedia a better place. I am an active user and can actively check on articles and help improve them during the drafting process. Thank you for your time!
UPDATE TO APPLICATION: I have throughly reviewed Wikipedia notability guidelines, and countless other guidelines for Wikipedia, so I believe I am fit to review articles. I am fully willing to quickly answer questions from any users. Thank you.
Antny08 (talk) 12:56, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- Not done, too many deleted articles and problems at AFD. Primefac (talk) 08:00, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- The deleted articles I have deleted myself except for some, and I have not had problems with AFD, I have only had discussions with people about what is correct and what is not. I ask that you please reconsider, as I believe I am more than fit to be a reviewer. Thank you and have a good day. Antny08 (talk) 13:08, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- For further information, I have only had 6 actually articles deleted. The rest were on talk pages / deleted to clean up space, such as my request for adminship. 3 of the articles I created that have been deleted were deleted by me, either because I realized they were not notable enough, or because of a name misspell (Battle of Namka Chun). The 3 that were deleted by others, 1 of them I was able to recreate. And the final 2 that were deleted by others and I was not able to recreate, were articles I did earlier into my time as a Wikipedia editor. I have not had any "problems" at AFD unless you are considering not agreeing with others on certain decisions as problems. Any mistakes that I have made have shown me not to make those mistakes again and why, and I believe that making these mistakes has given me more knowledge than somebody who never makes any mistakes. Thank you for your time, and I once again ask that you reconsider. Antny08 (talk) 13:15, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- 33% success at AFD is a problem. You are correct that the deleted pages are not a significant portion of the pages you have written overall, but I also just found the copyright violation among your deleted pages. This decline is not a "never", just a "not now". Primefac (talk) 08:33, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- That's because according to that it says I have only participated in 3 AfDs (which is incorrect). The one for the List of military engagements of World War II is wrong, I was the one who created the AfD and I wanted it to be merged. It saying that I wanted it to be deleted is an error with the system, so I should have 66% success. Although I have not participated in many AfDs directly, I have viewed countless other AfDs, so I am more familiar with the process than it shows. Antny08 (talk) 11:22, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- A 66% success rate is still very low and a recent copyright violation is an indicator that you are not yet experienced enough for this right. Not done, please continue to gain experience with AfD and content policies rather than arguing with this decline. Spicy (talk) 14:09, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- The copyright violation was because I was basing the text on an article off of a source I was using. It does not show I am not experienced enough in any way. I realized my mistake and as I stated earlier mistakes help you learn better than not making them in the first place. I recreated the article using my own words and it still up to this day. Having only 1 AfD result turn out against the consensus is not bad. Also note the copyright violation was multiple months ago, in my earlier times on Wikipedia, it is not that recent. Please reconsider. Antny08 (talk) 14:24, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- Let me be blunt; you have had two admins tell you that you are not quite ready. I said earlier you were at a "not now". Continuing to insist that you must have access to this tool will very quickly turn that into a "never". Get some more experience, write some more articles, and come back in a couple of months. Primefac (talk) 14:31, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- The copyright violation was because I was basing the text on an article off of a source I was using. It does not show I am not experienced enough in any way. I realized my mistake and as I stated earlier mistakes help you learn better than not making them in the first place. I recreated the article using my own words and it still up to this day. Having only 1 AfD result turn out against the consensus is not bad. Also note the copyright violation was multiple months ago, in my earlier times on Wikipedia, it is not that recent. Please reconsider. Antny08 (talk) 14:24, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- A 66% success rate is still very low and a recent copyright violation is an indicator that you are not yet experienced enough for this right. Not done, please continue to gain experience with AfD and content policies rather than arguing with this decline. Spicy (talk) 14:09, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- That's because according to that it says I have only participated in 3 AfDs (which is incorrect). The one for the List of military engagements of World War II is wrong, I was the one who created the AfD and I wanted it to be merged. It saying that I wanted it to be deleted is an error with the system, so I should have 66% success. Although I have not participated in many AfDs directly, I have viewed countless other AfDs, so I am more familiar with the process than it shows. Antny08 (talk) 11:22, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- 33% success at AFD is a problem. You are correct that the deleted pages are not a significant portion of the pages you have written overall, but I also just found the copyright violation among your deleted pages. This decline is not a "never", just a "not now". Primefac (talk) 08:33, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
User:Twinkle1990
- Twinkle1990 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs (block • csd • prod) · afd)
- @Primefac I'm applying again after 9+ months. I'm requesting this for a probationary period of 1-3 weeks to prove my competency. Let it be. If not then how I can prove my competency and efficiency in AfC? Twinkle1990 (talk) 15:36, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
- For reference see WT:WikiProject Articles for creation/Archive 53#We need to be more cautious which led to Twinkle1990 being removed. @Twinkle1990 what have you learned since that time and what would do differently? S0091 (talk) 17:02, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
- @S0091 whatever I learned is simple, my old perceptions and doings were wrong. And I don't hesitate to admit that I did wrong. Twinkle1990 (talk) 08:57, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- Twinkle1990, could you elaborate a little bit on that? What did you do wrong? Primefac (talk) 08:00, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- I did wrong by rejecting a handful of AfC drafts those were eligible for acceptance. Also, I accepted one draft, which was later deleted by AfD. At that time, I also did wrong by ignoring non-English sourcing. Those were my grave mistake. I have realized it over the time. Twinkle1990 (talk) 09:18, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Primefac if you don't give chance for just a few (say 1-2 weeks) just deny my request. Otherwise, give me a chance to prove myself. Twinkle1990 (talk) 15:05, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- The other requests were rather straight-forward. I am still thinking about your answers above. Please be patient. Primefac (talk) 15:12, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- Well. You are free to do so. I will have no hard feelings even if I am denied.--Twinkle1990 (talk) 02:39, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- The other requests were rather straight-forward. I am still thinking about your answers above. Please be patient. Primefac (talk) 15:12, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- Twinkle1990, could you elaborate a little bit on that? What did you do wrong? Primefac (talk) 08:00, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- @S0091 whatever I learned is simple, my old perceptions and doings were wrong. And I don't hesitate to admit that I did wrong. Twinkle1990 (talk) 08:57, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- For reference see WT:WikiProject Articles for creation/Archive 53#We need to be more cautious which led to Twinkle1990 being removed. @Twinkle1990 what have you learned since that time and what would do differently? S0091 (talk) 17:02, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
User:Macbeejack
- Macbeejack (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs (block • csd • prod) · afd)
- I think i understand Wikipedia's Notability Guidelines and having good faith to Wikipedia. Also wanted to contribute to reduce the heavy backlog load. Please check if i am eligible to review AFC drafts. Thank You. Macbeejack ☎ 04:43, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 08:00, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thank You Primefac. I will not let you down. Since I cannot see the review option on any draft, I would like to know if you have granted permission to review the draft. Macbeejack ☎ 05:06, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 08:00, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
User:CSMention269
- CSMention269 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs (block • csd • prod) · afd)
- I have most of my articles got accepted through AFC review. My policy is to work and assess only topics from WP:NPOL and India-related. Having such right will help me to reduce backlogs in AFC. CSMention269 (talk) 07:39, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
User:14 novembre
- 14 novembre (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs (block • csd • prod) · afd)
- I meet the criteria, and I have a significant experience in drafts, in fact, I have several times successfully nominated them for speedy deletion or moved to more appropriate title, so I think the possibility of reviewing drafts could help me to contribute constructively at Wikipedia. 14 novembre (talk) 14:45, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) You have least experience in AfD and AfC, apart from that you have ANI thread issues per your PCR permission declined by @Ingenuity:. CSMention269 (talk) 15:20, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- @CSMention269 why do you comment there? 14 novembre (talk) 08:34, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. I am still concerned about the various issues brought up in various locations about your tenacity and mistake-making, so I am restricting you to a maximum of five reviews per day. Primefac (talk) 20:49, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Primefac Thank you so much for your careful evaluation of the situation. I think you have done the best choice. Kind regards 14 novembre (talk) 21:39, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. I am still concerned about the various issues brought up in various locations about your tenacity and mistake-making, so I am restricting you to a maximum of five reviews per day. Primefac (talk) 20:49, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- @CSMention269 why do you comment there? 14 novembre (talk) 08:34, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) You have least experience in AfD and AfC, apart from that you have ANI thread issues per your PCR permission declined by @Ingenuity:. CSMention269 (talk) 15:20, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
User:Afyaniuhai
- Afyaniuhai (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs (block • csd • prod) · afd)
- As an experienced editor, acquiring afc helper script rights would enable me to contribute significantly to reducing the AFC backlog. ANUwrites 15:01, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
User:Anuwrites
- Just lost access to the AfC helper script because I changed my username from user:afyaniuhai to user:anuwrites. "Anuwrites" is not listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants. Could I ask to be added again on the list? ANUwrites 20:04, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
User:Guessitsavis
- Guessitsavis (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs (block • csd • prod) · afd)
- Hey, I was hoping to become an AfC reviewer to gain more experience with Wikipedia policy, and reduce the backlog. Thanks! Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 01:01, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
User:Listen1st
- I am requesting afc helper script rights to help reduce the AFC backlog. Listen1st (talk) 17:45, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
User:Unknown-Tree
- Unknown-Tree (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs (block • csd • prod) · afd)
- I would like to be able to use the AfC helper script to review nominations for AfC, as I feel I sufficiently meet the criteria. Unknown-Tree🌲? (talk) 01:53, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
User:V.B.Speranza
- V.B.Speranza (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs (block • csd • prod) · afd)
- Hi fellow editors, I would like to be able to review AfC submissions.
I’ve created over 130 articles and one of them is GA. After being active for over a year with near 5000 edits I believe I acquired a decent amount of knowledge regarding Wikipedia's deletion policy which is evidenced by my contributions. Thank you for your attention. V.B.Speranza (talk) 21:58, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
User:Hassocks5489
- Hassocks5489 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs (block • csd • prod) · afd)
- I am an experienced Wikipedian with an extensive record of article creations and other contributions over an 18-year period (>50,000 edits, >300 articles created). I have recently started exploring the AfC space and have noticed some promising drafts in areas of my particular expertise, which I would like to bring to article space and improve. I would expect my future reviewing activity to be focused on the same general areas. I am on Wikipedia every day and can commit to responding to queries promptly. Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 09:35, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
User:Jonathan Deamer
- Jonathan Deamer (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs (block • csd • prod) · afd)
- I'm requesting AFC helper script rights as I currently participate in recent changes/new pages patrolling and AfDs, and would like to contribute to the project further.
- I've read the reviewer criteria and believe I meet them:
- Experience in the quick-fail criteria review step from work on speedy deletions, vandalism patrols.
- Experience in the notability and verifiability review step from participation in AfDs and my general editing/page creation.
- Experience in the suitability review step through my own article creation, DYK submissions and general editing history. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 11:19, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
User:Brindille1
- Brindille1 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs (block • csd • prod) · afd)
- I've been editing a lot of articles in the US football project, and have noticed that some articles have gone quite a while without a review (see Draft:2024 Hartford Athletic Season for example). I'd love to be a reviewer to encourage and help new Wikipedia editors. Brindille1 (talk) 03:11, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
User:Spiderjiu
- I am working on WP:DRAFT, known WP:HTCAP, WP:YFA and WP:N as well. Spiderjiu (talk) 15:29, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
User:Chennai Passangai
- Chennai Passangai (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs (block • csd • prod) · afd)
- Reason for requesting afc helper script rights Chennai Passangai (talk) 14:56, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
User:Robertjamal12
- Robertjamal12 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs (block • csd • prod) · afd)
- Hello, I would like to get involved in WP:AFC to help reduce the backlog and gain experience Robertjamal12 ~🔔 13:42, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Robertjamal12, I will be honest, your AFD stats are... really not good. How do you think this demonstrates that you have a
understanding the deletion policy
? Primefac (talk) 12:04, 1 April 2024 (UTC)- @Primefac Yes, I understand the stats are not good that is why I took sometime off AFD discussions. I think I have a good understanding now and would like to gain more experience here at the WP:AFC as well -- Robertjamal12 ~🔔 12:26, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Robertjamal12, I will be honest, your AFD stats are... really not good. How do you think this demonstrates that you have a
User:Shonyx
- I am became an AFC reviewer with an 502 edits. I can confirm the articles that been created and I can relate the created article to electrical engineering, engineering etc. I don't have experience to be an AFC reviewer but this is a great idea to review the new articles. Shonyx 03:44, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
April
NPR (April)
User:GraziePrego
- GraziePrego (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs (block • csd • prod) · afd)
- Just noticed I'm not on the list of reviewers, but I've been a reviewer with AFCH tool usage for a while now :) Can I be added to the list please? GraziePrego (talk) 04:09, 26 April 2024 (UTC) GraziePrego (talk) 04:09, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Those with the NPR permission are given access to AFCH automatically, and don't need to be on the list. LittlePuppers (talk) 03:49, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Inactive (April)
User:Gryllida
- Was helping previously, with access having expired due to inactivity. Keen to resume activity now. Please re-add me to participants list. Thanks Gryllida (talk, e-mail) 22:34, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
User:Sahaib
- I used to contribute to WP:AFD and would like to review more articles. I am less busy nowadays as well, former name was User:Sahaib3005. Sahaib (talk) 07:35, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
User:-noah-
- Hi! I used to be a probationary reviewer a while ago but then I stopped being active and my permissions expired. Thanks! Noah 💬 00:03, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Name change (April)
User:Xoak
Xoak (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs (block • csd • prod) · afd)
Was renamed a bit ago from Xkalponik to Xoak.X (talk) 11:28, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
New (Apr)
User:Idunnox3
- Hi! I'd like to contribute to WP:AfC project and now I have enough time for it. I've read the rules, and I have some WP:AFD experience to start with. Idunnox3 (talk) 12:26, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
User:Shonyx
- I have an experience with WP:AFD and reverting articles. As a participator of WikiProject Articles for creation, I have now the experience of:
- reject/decline the draft if the draft has low on citations and no notable support between independent sources and the draft itself.
- approve of these drafts and move them to article space if theres a connection between independent sources, affiliated sources and the draft must have a inline citations. If does the article had 1550 letters, then I slapped (means 'nominate deletion of the article) and copyright violation.
- declining of the draft submitted because breaks the WP:GNG, WP:BIO, etc.
I have more than 500 edits and I have low on undeleted edits, see my contributions Shonyx 06:06, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- and one last thing I mentioned that my account is more than 90 days Shonyx 06:09, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
User:AWN08
- I would like to review AfC primarily on British non-profit organisations, international relations, militaries and politics. AWN08 (talk) 22:19, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
User:NegativeMP1
- NegativeMP1 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs (block • csd • prod) · afd)
- Requesting AfC reviewer to help out in more general areas of Wikipedia, which includes decreasing the backlog. My account is about a year old, and while I've created very few articles overall (25~), I would say I have pretty good comprehension of the notability guidelines. I have plenty of experience in AfD, having participated in it nearly as long as I've been on Wikipedia with a 62% success rate (+ more if you count merges). I also have a general idea of other notability guidelines, but I only say "general idea" because I don't write articles for, say, sports players. I would respond to questions quickly as I am very active on-wiki. λ NegativeMP1 04:41, 5 April 2024 (UTC) λ NegativeMP1 04:41, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
User:Xkalponik
- I've been a longtime editor with 3.5k+ edits, created (out of the 4 deleted articles 3 were self-delete) and contributed to a fair number of articles, having GA, and passed DYKs. I've participated in various WikiProjects, most notably WIR and WikiProject:Fungi. I've experience with AFDs and noticeboard discussions. For quite some time now, I'm almost regular to the wiki and if able, I hope to respond promptly to questions about my reviews. I have a good grasp of the policies and guidelines mentioned in the reviewing instructions, especially the various notability guidelines.
I'd like to help the AFC backlogs, especially with biological nomenclature articles, as I'm more often than not somewhat familiar with and passionate about these fields. X (talk) 14:14, 7 April 2024 (UTC) X (talk) 14:14, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 11:54, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
User:Staraction
- Staraction (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs (block • csd • prod) · afd)
- I want to be able to help with the AfC backlog! I've been working with creating new articles through AfC for a while now, so I have a good idea of the requirements, especially WP:NOTABILITY (which I've learned through experience). I believe I meet the minimum requirements and would like to help more. Thanks for considering! Staraction (talk | contribs) 22:01, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
User:Futuristicediting
- Futuristicediting (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs (block • csd • prod) · afd)
- To start a new beginning Futuristicediting (talk) 11:36, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Not done. You were just blocked from moving pages, which will make it impossible to be a reviewer. Additionally, the recent series of rapid, useless edits to your talk page does not give me any confidence. If you continue editing disruptively, you will be blocked sitewide. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 15:47, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
User:SafariScribe
- SafariScribe (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs (block • csd • prod) · afd)
- Hi, I'm requesting the AFC reviewing right after reading more of the reviewing instructions to volunteer in WP:AFC. Furthermore, I have participated actively in AFD, and from my contibs, helped out in certain tasks of the encyclopedia. I have also helped in some draft reviewing, so it's a good way of helping the backlog (since it do rise each time I look at it). Thanks for the consideration.— Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 22:34, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
User:Shadow311
User:CanonNi
- Hello. I would like to request access to the AfC Helper Script to help review new articles (and lower the backlog). I have over 4500 edits, with over 1500 in the mainspace, and have participated in the deletion process through CSD and AfD (though I've only started logging CSD recently). I have also created several articles and have helped others create theirs. I have thoroughly read the reviewing instructions and will start reviewing carefully right away, if access is given. Thank you for considering my request!
'''[[User:CanonNi]]'''
(talk|contribs) 23:56, 19 April 2024 (UTC)- Done. Primefac (talk) 11:34, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you so much!
'''[[User:CanonNi]]'''
(talk|contribs) 11:36, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you so much!
- Done. Primefac (talk) 11:34, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
User:HistoryTheorist
- HistoryTheorist (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs (block • csd • prod) · afd)
- I would like to help move promising drafts into the mainspace and return the cruddier drafts back to their authors. I don't plan on using the tools much as writing/reviewing GAs is where my interests are at, though. As a content creator, I have created a few articles myself and have light AfD experience. I also got a crash course on notability from NPP school (on which I feel pretty confident about now) but never finished as my teacher went inactive. ❤HistoryTheorist❤ 04:23, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
User:Samoht27
- I wish to provide help to AfC, as it serves an important role in making sure Wikipedia's information is kept up to its standards of quality, notability, and maintaining a neutral point of view. In other words, I want to help the encyclopedia be a useful collection of information, rather than an indiscriminate collection of information. Samoht27 (talk) 17:20, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
User:Nokia621
User:Kp2016rockin
- Kp2016rockin (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs (block • csd • prod) · afd)
- I 've been inactive on Wikipedia for a while and have since returned. I was a participant here before being idle. With my return, I would like to help clear up the backlog more. kpgamingz (rant me) 00:53, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
User:Captbloodrock
- Captbloodrock (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs (block • csd • prod) · afd)
- I've been a dedicated Wikipedian for several years now in terms of creating new articles and editing existing ones, and would like to expand my responsibilities by also being able to review new articles. Captbloodrock (talk) 18:02, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
May
New (May)
User:Matthew Wellington
- Matthew Wellington (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs (block • csd • prod) · afd)
- I would like to help out at AfC as recommended by Hey man im josh, while I had requested for perms here: [[1]] Matthew Wellington (talk) 12:57, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
User:MAINEiac4434
- MAINEiac4434 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs (block • csd • prod) · afd)
- I'd like to help the backlog, and improve Wikipedia! I have over 13,000 edits in over 13 years contributing, including a handful of page creations. If given access, I can start reviewing right away, as I've just familiarized myself with the AfC guidelines. MAINEiac4434 (talk) 16:20, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Iwaqarhashmi
- Iwaqarhashmi (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs (block • csd • prod) · afd)
- I would be happy to assist with reviewing drafts and managing the backlog. I have thoroughly reviewed the provided criteria and instructions, and I believe I'm experienced enough to have this permission. Waqar💬 19:51, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Dclemens1971
- Dclemens1971 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs (block • csd • prod) · afd)
- I have extensive experience with new page creation, reliable source guidelines, notability policies and participation at AfD, and I'd love to help out with reducing the AfC backlog. Thanks! Dclemens1971 (talk) 12:59, 2 May 2024 (UTC)