Wikipedia talk:Who is a low-profile individual

Essays Low‑impact

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia essays, a collaborative effort to organise and monitor the impact of Wikipedia essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.EssaysWikipedia:WikiProject EssaysTemplate:WikiProject EssaysWikiProject Wikipedia essays pages
Low	This page has been rated as Low-impact on the project's impact scale.
	The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.

Biography Project‑class

	Biography portal This page is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Project	This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Major rewrite edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I've substantially rewritten this, since it's actually being cited, but needed some work. The principal issue was that it did not adequately distinguish between hucksters, power-grabbers, celebs and egotists on the one hand, versus on the other hand various classes of people such as people who have to answer journalists' questions as part of their job, local activists, non-grandstanding experts, authors, etc., and a number of others. This was particularly close to home for me, because I would have been classified as "high-profile" under the version of this essay that I encountered, when I am in fact very low-profile and have been for around 8 years (I've only done two major interviews in that time, and both as the spokesthing for an employer, not as "special me, the expert"). I don't particularly want people writing an article about me (one could be written and reliably & independently sourced with relative ease, even if it would not be particularly long), especially not on the basis that I'm allegedly "high-profile".

Anyway, I realize that an edit this major is a WP:BOLD move, so I'm not going to be terribly alarmed if a lot of what I put in and changed is re-changed. I would hope against a blanket WP:BRD revert, however. Such moves are rarely constructive in my experience, because they resist change, period, rather than objecting to particular items of change. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 09:12, 9 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

As the originator of this particular essay, I think what you've done has been quite positive. Jclemens (talk) 18:07, 9 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Public figure? edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Question.

A certain equestrian is a former Olympian. Competed in two separate Olympic events.

He is also a former United States Equestrian Federation Equestrian of the Year.

In your view, does he qualify as a public figure. Inasmuch as he has held "a position of pre-eminence" in a sport, "at more than a locally-significant level"? --2603:7000:2143:8500:A45B:E4AA:91E9:A3F9 (talk) 07:20, 4 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic