Wikipedia talk:User rights are not a golden ticket

Essays Low‑impact

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia essays, a collaborative effort to organise and monitor the impact of Wikipedia essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.EssaysWikipedia:WikiProject EssaysTemplate:WikiProject EssaysWikiProject Wikipedia essays pages
Low	This page has been rated as Low-impact on the project's impact scale.
	The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.

DHMO explains this essay at WT:RFA. [1]

The point is that, had Charlie not found the Golden Ticket, he would have been poor and lived a sucky life forever. So the Golden Ticket changed him from dud to stud. But UserRights don't change Wikipedia users from dud to stud. That's the point (complete with analogy! :) dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 08:58, 20 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'm not sure that's correct. If you read the book or see the film again, you'll notice that the Golden Ticket had nothing to do with his "change". He had a sense of hope, which by chance, led him to find money to buy the candy bar and gain admittance to the factory. Here, he was able to prove his capability for honesty and trustworthiness. In other words, he never changed at all. I think it's obvious who lived the "poor and sucky life", but it wasn't Charlie. Viriditas (talk) 13:05, 28 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

and there is no lack of contributors to fill shoes. - Quantity has never been the problem. It's quality. And we have a serious lack of it here (on Wikipedia that is, not this essay). Viriditas (talk) 12:51, 28 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Add topic