Wikipedia talk:Sexual content

Essays High‑impact

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia essays, a collaborative effort to organise and monitor the impact of Wikipedia essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.EssaysWikipedia:WikiProject EssaysTemplate:WikiProject EssaysWikiProject Wikipedia essays pages
High	This page has been rated as High-impact on the project's impact scale.
	The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sexual content page.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3

This page was nominated for deletion on 21 November 2008. The result of the discussion was Policy proposals may be marked as rejected if they are rejected, or historical if they fail to achieve consensus, they are not deleted.

Archives:

Proposal 1: /Archive 1
Essay 1: /Archive 2
Proposal 2: /Archive 3

Let's keep it as an essay this time edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Back in 2008 when this proposal was rejected for a first time, I decided that the best use of this page title was an informative essay on Wikipedia best practices on sexual content. Now that a second proposal was made and rejected, I decided to once more turn it back into an essay. I think this is the best choice — rather than dictate new, redundant, or contradictory rules on sexual content, we can use this essay to document existing practices and philosophies in a central place. It achieves the goal of a sexual content policy: describing (rather than prescribing) best practice without the fuss of deciding if there is consensus for a policy. Thus, we should lay off the sexual content policy proposals unless a new argument can be made for one. (To that end, I have included a section in the essay on why recommendations for a policy have been rejected.) hare j 07:43, 5 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Freedom of speech = New WikiProject edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

WP:WikiProject Freedom of speech

Hi there, I'm notifying this essay talk page due to its relevance to Freedom of speech. I've recently gone ahead and created WP:WikiProject Freedom of speech. If you're interested, here are some easy things you can do:

List yourself as a participant in the WikiProject, by adding your username here: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Freedom_of_speech#Participants.
Add userbox {{User Freedom of speech}} to your userpage, which lists you as a member of the WikiProject.
Tag relevant talk pages of articles and other relevant pages using {{WikiProject Freedom of speech}}.
Join in discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Freedom of speech.
Notify others you think might be interested in Freedom of speech to join the WikiProject.

Thank you for your interest in Freedom of speech, — Cirt (talk) 03:20, 26 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic