Wikipedia talk:Sending letters

Latest comment: 18 years ago by Anthere

Should the poll be started at once - isn't it better to just discuss first? / Habj 20:20, 19 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

I attempted to solicit discussion earlier, but nobody seemed to have anything to say about it. Feel free to discuss first. Andre (talk) 20:29, August 19, 2005 (UTC)

[comment based on this version]:

I don't understand the point of this vote. You're expecting Jimmy to sign these letters, but as far as I know, you haven't actually asked if whether he'd be willing to do that. You can't just start voting on what he is or isn't going to do with his own time.
"All responses to the letter sent back to Wikimedia are linked here" - who is going to do that? This seems very impractical to demand by voting that any volunteer should be doing this.
Why would any letters that are not official business of the Wikimedia Foundation be sent on official stationery? Angela. 22:20, August 19, 2005 (UTC)
<thoughtful mode>The board itself does not even have/use official Wikimedia headed letters...</thoughtful mode> Anthere 23:23, 19 August 2005 (UTC)Reply
In theory we might though since James F. made some when he made the business cards. Angela. 00:33, August 20, 2005 (UTC)
Perhaps the setup is impractical. The idea was to send request letters that carry the weight and prestige of the Wikimedia Foundation, yet bear the messages of individual nobody editors. I wasn't going to bother Jimmy with the concept before there was even a consensus that this should be done to begin with, but apparently he's made his opinion on it clear. Also, I wasn't just assuming or expecting that he'd be able to do it, note that I wrote Jimbo, perhaps? Andre (talk) 21:03, August 20, 2005 (UTC)

No one can send letters under official letterhead without the explicit approval of the foundation, therefore this vote is misguided. Jimbo Wales 03:06, August 20, 2005 (UTC) [1]

From Jimbo's talk page: I'm not sure why you deleted the page... although I was proposing a system for sending snail mail (for which step 3 was If it has consensus, letter is passed on to Wikimedia Foundation official for approval), the page had a separate section that was intended to be a guideline for sending independent, non-Wikimedia-approved mail. I'm going to restore the page and delete the offending section for now. Andre (talk) 04:48, August 20, 2005 (UTC)

And besides, rejected proposals go to Category:Wikipedia rejected policies. Andre (talk) 04:51, August 20, 2005 (UTC)