Wikipedia talk:Responding to incivility

Essays Low‑impact

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia essays, a collaborative effort to organise and monitor the impact of Wikipedia essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.EssaysWikipedia:WikiProject EssaysTemplate:WikiProject EssaysWikiProject Wikipedia essays pages
Low	This page has been rated as Low-impact on the project's impact scale.
	The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.

Refusal to get the point: is it incivility? edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

In response to Toddst1's dubious tagging.

I suppose it depends on whether or not they are refusing to get the point in bad faith or good faith. I find it is more often done in bad faith, and therefore qualifies as incivility. But there are cases where it is not done in bad faith and therefore technically may not be classified as incivility. Regardless, I think it should remain because it is something that comes close to breaking civility policy, and is best responded to the way this essay lays out. ––FormalDude talk 04:15, 17 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

At the end of the day it's your essay. Just trying to help make it stronger. Thanks for the response. Toddst1 (talk) 04:19, 17 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Toddst1: I appreciate your feedback and trying to help make it stronger. It is my essay, but I'm not in any way trying to WP:OWN it, I'd much rather have it become a strong community essay. If you still think it's best to remove it I'm fine with that. ––FormalDude talk 02:13, 19 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your call. Toddst1 (talk) 13:15, 19 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

I've removed it for now. Thanks! ––FormalDude talk 07:33, 20 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic