Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Template:Music of Canada

WP:FORUMSHOP edit

This is now the fourth or fifth attempt that Miesianiacal has made to get his own way. It's very simple: GSTQ has been disputed for inclusion in this template for two years. Per recent discussions at the talkpage, there is now no consensus for inclusion in the template. End of story, and no amount of trying different ways to get his own way will change that. This is bullshit and a waste of time. → ROUX  17:10, 13 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

You were asked if you could suggest another venue at or method by which the dispute can be resolved, and your response was "[y]ou're welcome to start whatever procedure you like". This is the next step in the established dispute resolution process. --Ħ MIESIANIACAL 17:23, 13 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
Your failure to quote accurately is more evidence of your fundamental dishonesty. Give it up. There is no consensus for inclusion, there has not been for two years despite your tactics, and no matter how much you draw out the process in order to wear everyone down--your usual MO, and don't even bother pretending it's not--that will not change. → ROUX  17:44, 13 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
The quote is verbatim and completely within context, as is evident to anyone who looks. You also misrepresent the history of the template and my involvement; but, there too, the truth is self-evident.
If you don't want to participate in this dispute resolution, then please indicate your "decline" on the project page. (Though, I'd rather you accepted, since doing so will make closure on this matter more likely.)
You clearly see my behaviour as an issue. I suggest that, instead of these persistent attacks directly at me, you put your concerns before the community at the appropriate location. I note you're acitve at WP:ANI; perhaps you can raise your concerns there. --Ħ MIESIANIACAL 17:50, 13 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
The quote is entirely out of context, as the rest of what I said made it completely clear that I knew exactly what you were up to. The rest of the bullshit you're spouting is beneath my attention. → ROUX  18:00, 13 April 2012 (UTC)Reply