Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Role-playing video game

There is only 1 editor who disagrees with the circumstances by and large. In addition there was no attempt made for an RfC or neutral 3rd-party opinion. Finally, Therpgfanatic is not characteristizing the facts as section blanking something backed up by what are generally considered RSes to back up the statements is vandalism.

EDIT:While I agree the sections are imperfect they are backed up largely by what Wikipedia would consider reliable sources. Before this goes to mediation, a well publisized RfC should be done.Jinnai 22:12, 11 February 2011 (UTC)Reply