Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Religion in Africa
Agreement edit
In the section Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation/Religion_in_Africa#Parties.27_agreement_to_mediationIt is inaccurate in much of the statements regarding admittance of sources being unreliable. Suppose it would be better if readers check out the talkpage to verify for themselves.
Furthermore, as an experienced editor on English Wikipedia, a mentor, guide and a part of the response team to new editors, it is very important that we make sure to set a good example.
The Lead
The content included in the edits to which mediation has been requested have been referenced with reliable and veriafiable material. However, Qwyrxian claims that they are unreliable links to websites; when infact they have clear refered to published material or web pages that inturn refered to reliable and published material.
Misleading Terms The content included in the edits to which mediation has been requested have been referenced with reliable and veriafiable material. However, Qwyrxian claims that this is Wikipedia:OR when infact the inline citation referes the reader to a reliable and published material. Otelemuyen 12:25, 29 March 2012 (UTC)