Wikipedia talk:Professional opinion-havers

Latest comment: 4 years ago by GreenMeansGo in topic RfO
WikiProject iconEssays Low‑impact
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia essays, a collaborative effort to organise and monitor the impact of Wikipedia essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.
LowThis page has been rated as Low-impact on the project's impact scale.
Note icon
The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.

Title edit

Hate to say it, but you've got too many hyphens – should be simply Wikipedia:Professional opinion-havers. It's the difference between a professional haver of opinions and a haver of professional opinions. (There are some hyphen–endash issues here as well, but they need not detain us.) EEng 00:42, 28 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ah. Fair enough. GMGtalk 01:37, 28 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
Just my professional opinion, of course. EEng 07:19, 28 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
  Done GMGtalk 14:47, 28 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
Also, for whatever it's worth "you are wrong" I believe is an Army-ism. As in "If you are not in formation you are wrong. Unfuck your soup sandwich or beat your face until you do." Translated: You should be in formation now. If you are not, then you should do so immediately or you should do push ups. GMGtalk 14:52, 28 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • Neutral - I don't have an opinion on this essay yet, but I want to leave this comment here just to let everyone know that I will have an opinion soon, so be on the lookout for it. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 15:17, 28 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

RfO edit

  • Should we have opinions on having opinions?

Survey edit

  • Ambivalent - I like how meta it is, but it might be too meta. GMGtalk 15:51, 28 November 2019 (UTC)Reply