Wikipedia talk:Premature adminship

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia essays, a collaborative effort to organise and monitor the impact of Wikipedia essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.EssaysWikipedia:WikiProject EssaysTemplate:WikiProject EssaysWikiProject Wikipedia essays pages
	The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.

RfC about premature adminship

Latest comment: 1 day ago2 comments1 person in discussion

{{rfc|policy}} Should adminship be considered for editors who have been editing for under 2 years? 9t5 (talk) 21:05, 5 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

No - I believe that a minimum of 5 years of editing should be required for an editor to be considered for adminship. This is to allow a substantial period of time that can be analyzed by admins before granting the privilege to an editor — protecting the community against premature adminship and the potential for abuse of the privilege.

9t5 (talk) 21:08, 5 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

LLM/AI generated essays...

Latest comment: 1 day ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors the template at the top says, but the entire essay is just the AI's generated response, to a prompt that we do not even know. I guess you can agree with it... And the RFC, is supposed to be based on the AI's essay?
This all strikes me as the wrong way to do things. – 2804:F1...D5:33ED (talk) 21:29, 5 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic