Wikipedia talk:Notability (web)/Archive contents

Report generated based on a request from Wikipedia talk:Notability (web). It matches the following masks: Wikipedia talk:Notability (websites)/Archive <#>, Wikipedia talk:Notability (web)/Archive <#>, Wikipedia talk:Notability (web).
This page was last edited by Legobot (talk | contribs) 2 months ago. (Update timer)

Discussion Topic	Replies (estimated)	Archive Link
Shorty Awards and Foodimentary	7	Wikipedia talk:Notability (web)#Shorty Awards and Foodimentary
Copyediting	2	Wikipedia talk:Notability (web)#Copyediting
With blog notability, aim for inclusivity	4	Wikipedia talk:Notability (web)#With blog notability, aim for inclusivity
If a website has a lot of famous/notable people reviewed there, shouldn't it be considered notable?	3	Wikipedia talk:Notability (web)#If a website has a lot of famous/notable people reviewed there, shouldn't it be considered notable?
RfC: Is WP:WEB criterion three really necessary?	17	Wikipedia talk:Notability (web)#RfC: Is WP:WEB criterion three really necessary?
http://www.muturzikin.com	2	Wikipedia talk:Notability (web)#http://www.muturzikin.com
Notability of fonts	2	Wikipedia talk:Notability (web)#Notability of fonts
RfC: Notability of YouTubers	34	Wikipedia talk:Notability (web)#RfC: Notability of YouTubers
RfC: How can non-web content be classed as web content?	19	Wikipedia talk:Notability (web)#RfC: How can non-web content be classed as web content?
Notability on YouTube	3	Wikipedia talk:Notability (web)#Notability on YouTube
RfC about independent sources for academic biographies	1	Wikipedia talk:Notability (web)#RfC about independent sources for academic biographies
SNGs and GNG	1	Wikipedia talk:Notability (web)#SNGs and GNG
But GNG=Notable, yes?	6	Wikipedia talk:Notability (web)#But GNG=Notable, yes?
Web SNG is a bit verbose	2	Wikipedia talk:Notability (web)#Web SNG is a bit verbose