Wikipedia talk:Namechecking

Essays Low‑impact

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia essays, a collaborative effort to organise and monitor the impact of Wikipedia essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.EssaysWikipedia:WikiProject EssaysTemplate:WikiProject EssaysWikiProject Wikipedia essays pages
Low	This page has been rated as Low-impact on the project's impact scale.
	The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.

Parents as namechecking edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I am not entirely sure that identification of parents names in articles is a problem that this essay intends to address. I agree with the rest of the examples. --Bejnar (talk) 21:46, 17 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Common practice is that it can be acceptable to give forenames (and possibly occupations) of non-notable parents (I don't see the argument for extending this to siblings; any notable & bluelinked relatives can of course be mentioned) in biographical articles where the extra detail is appropriately and succinctly presented, does not bloat the article and does not seem overly namechecky. Deiz talk 16:57, 10 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Relevance, not notability edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Much of what this essay says is basically nonsense (for example, the inclusion of names of people relevant to a topic plainly does assist reader's understanding) and the proposition that all people mentioned must always be notable (rather than merely relevant, even if one or more independent sources say they are relevant) appears incompatible with NNC. James500 (talk) 01:02, 25 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic