Wikipedia talk:Is wikidrama bad?

Essays Low‑impact

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia essays, a collaborative effort to organise and monitor the impact of Wikipedia essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.EssaysWikipedia:WikiProject EssaysTemplate:WikiProject EssaysWikiProject Wikipedia essays pages
Low	This page has been rated as Low-impact on the project's impact scale.
	The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.

This page was nominated for deletion on 2008-03-26. The result of the discussion was speedy keep as nomination by banned user.

This stuff is overdone. I just came here from an RfA where three out of every four !votes listed "drama" as a reason for !voting the way that they did. I've seen entries at DRV described as "wikidrama" just by their very existence. Enough already! 74.137.106.2 (talk) 15:33, 28 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Catharsis edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I was under the impression that Catharsis as psychotherapy has been discredited. My psych teacher (read: not a WP:RS) said that it generally leads to elevation of emotions because anger (etc.) isn't a physical thing, it's an emotion and cannot "build up." On the contrary, by "unleashing" it, we actually "feed" it. I have no WP:RS as I already handed in my text book. --Thin boy 00 @819, i.e. 18:39, 1 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Add topic