Wikipedia talk:If MOS doesn't need a rule on something, then it needs to not have a rule on that thing
Latest comment: 4 years ago by EEng in topic Supreme Court analogy
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Supreme Court analogy edit
If that analogy is the best someone could come up with, then either zero effort was put into writing this, or it's simply a weak premise. Reduce essaybloat. Primergrey (talk) 12:21, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Definitely zero effort. EEng 12:27, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Don't about you, but I prefer my wiki "thoroughly percolated" rather than just freeze dried instant. Martinevans123 (talk) 12:40, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- How about, "Because shepherding the MoS is akin to trying to use a manul as a head-warmer – right down to the likely hair loss and all the screaming in pain and terror ..." — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 20:59, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- WP:NOTMANUAL. EEng 05:26, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
- How about, "Because shepherding the MoS is akin to trying to use a manul as a head-warmer – right down to the likely hair loss and all the screaming in pain and terror ..." — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 20:59, 30 November 2019 (UTC)