Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/York Park/archive4
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Aaroncrick in topic 2c review
2c review
editFifelfoo (talk) 07:19, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- Has a publication date, "Wednesday, 18 October 2006" :"Relive Tassie football's glory days"
- Deceptive: ""A History of Tasmanian Football".". Authored by The Department of Economic Development, Tourism and the Arts. Hosted at http://www.tassiefootyteam.com.au/. Not exactly published by "Government of Tasmania"
- Ah ... nice spot .. what do you suggest however? Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 09:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- |author=The Department of Economic Development, Tourism and the Arts (Tas.) |publisher=tassiefootyteam.com.au ? Fifelfoo (talk) 10:10, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- Ah ... nice spot .. what do you suggest however? Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 09:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- Is a submission to a Senate inquiry, make explicit, ""Launceston City Council / York Park & Inveresk Precinct Authority Submission". " re: Parliament of Australia Senate Inquiry, Inquiry into matters relating to the establishment of an Australian Football League Team for Tasmania, Senate Standing Committee on Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport
- Has an author, "Rod Morris", " "A Short History". Launceston City Cycling Club."
- Grandstand fire deliberately lit has a byline, "AAP"
- Citation of ABC inconsistent. Are we contracting or spelling out?
- Spelling out. Done. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 09:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- Hawks confirm Tasmanian deal has a wireline AAP
- Melbourne wins friendly has a wireline AAP
- Aurora changing shape has a byline Adam Smith
- Lewis to beef up... has a byline ROGER VAUGHAN
- check your Examiners, I don't have a sub
- Neither. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 09:36, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- Damn. Just a tick. Nope. SLNSW, USYD, UNSW don't hold. Fifelfoo (talk) 10:10, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- Neither. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 09:36, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- You may wish to indicate which subsection of ABC authored a component
- Why not Tasmania has a byline David Davutovic
- Full citation please: The Examiner, p. 1, 1959-03-18
- Full citation please: The Examiner, p. 1, 2007-12-09
- Info already existed when editing this article. Suggest we scrap info? Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 09:36, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- If it doesn't need a citation, and the citation is poor... there's a solution implicit. Fifelfoo (talk) 10:10, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- Also, sorry for the jargon. A byline is a by-line, the line which says who its by. If the article is authored, its a very strong expectation that the author will be recognised. Similarly, if the article came from a wire, a news service, like AAP, its customary to indicate this. Personally, I'd chuck AAP in as the author, unless a separate author is listed. If you can't get at The Examiner, then you've done the best you can do. Fifelfoo (talk) 10:18, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks, doing the ones I can do. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 21:56, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- Done wire and by-lines. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 06:01, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks, doing the ones I can do. Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 21:56, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- Info already existed when editing this article. Suggest we scrap info? Aaroncrick (talk) Review me! 09:36, 8 December 2009 (UTC)