Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/Missouri River/archive3

TCO critiques

Shannon, I totally FEEL for you going through this thing multiple times. You really have some heart to put up with it. I would be throwing my rattle and kicking the walls, with the criticism.

1. Link North America the first time and then no more. One link in article is plenty.

2. Yeah, looks better without the coordinates. Honest, it will look even better without the damned infobox. There's no reason that that stuff can't be put into the end as a table. The key features like source and end and length will be in lead anyhow. Same on the map in the infobox. We smush it in there to follow a "rule" and then it's unuable, because of size. Not sure the answer for you and don't want to put you in a position of FAC reviewer versus Project. So I guess leave it the ugly Project way.

TCO (talk) 18:31, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

I looked at a preview of the article with the map under the geobox, at 500px. It looked rather good except the huge picture'd be out of place with the rest of the article. And yep, there's a lot of over linking in the article... maybe that's why they don't like it... Shann_ºn^Talk 20:44, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

I feel for ya, babe. Hang in there. You are a good soul.TCO (talk) 23:29, 28 June 2011 (UTC)