Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/Mereka Bilang, Saya Monyet!/archive1

Addressed comments from TBrandley

Comments

• You need to add alt text to the article's images per WP:ALT; it should briefly explain the contents of the image itself

• Not necessary at FAC, but added anyways.

• Try to avoid pipe links per WP:PIPELINK

• Any cases in your opinion which do not follow WP:PIPELINK? Tempo (Indonesian magazine) will certainly not read well without a pipe, and I consider it awkward to rephrase a sentence so that Child sexual abuse is not piped.

• "wide" worldwide?

• National. Based on my experience, probably 3 January in Jakarta, then spreading out over a couple of weeks, so adding "Indonesia-wide" would not be correct as it was certainly not screened in Papua on the same day, if ever.

• For what it's worth, "wide" releases in film are generally just contrasted with limited releases; a wide release doesn't have a set definition in so much as it just means "widely available for viewing". Lawless (film) had a "wide" release but I had to travel a few towns out to find a cinema which was even showing it once a day. GRAPPLE X 01:07, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

• Unlink US% per WP:OVERLINK

• Done

• Remove bolding from award titles in the award table per MOS:BOLD by adding plainrowheaders to the table coding

• Done

• "Best Film" is missing recipient, the film itself add there to clarify things

• Not done. It is implicit as this is an article about the film. Recipient is meant to indicate a person. See Ruma Maida and ? (film), which also use this format.

• "There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view." from the automatic peer reviewer

• Any specific complaints? Any opinions that I see are credited to their holds, except for the Sastra wangi one which is a fairly common view
  • It showed the word, "is considered" what is about that? TBrandley 01:06, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
    • It's referring to sastra wangi, which multiple sources list her as a member of. Now, Djenar does not agree with the label, hence the "considered" — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:15, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

• "You may wish to convert your form of references to the cite.php footnote system that WP:WIAFA 1(c) highly recommends." from automatic peer reviewer

• Long argument short, WIAFA 1c does not recommend a specific style.
  • That's fine. Just a bot that did that automaticly, thought I'd add it I didn't see anything myself. Just a bot.

TBrandley 00:52, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

• Thanks for looking into this. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:01, 25 September 2012 (UTC)