Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/Eraserhead/archive1
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Crisco 1492
- Prose comments from Crisco 1492
- "because of the difficulty of obtaining funds to complete the film" - Any way to cut back on the wording here? perhaps "funding issues" or "funding problems"?
- "Its surrealist imagery and sexual undercurrents have been seen as its key thematic elements, and its sound design as its technical highlight" - Some rewording to avoid four "its" in the same sentence, perhaps?
- "the creature seen earlier." - The spermatozoon one?
- "in a billowing cloud of eraser shavings." - In or as?
- Oxford gives green-lit and not greenlit.
- his wife Sissy Spacek - Whose wife?
- "Jennifer Lynch has recalled growing up around the sets used for the film, stating that "Eraserhead was my childhood"." - what's the value to this? If it's to be kept it should be expanded on with critical commentary.
- "a sound track (two words)" is the parenthetical in the original? If not, use {{sic}}
- "providing low-level background noise in every scene. This provides" - Perhaps avoid the repetition of "providing - provides"
- "has been perceived" - looks weasely. Perhaps clarify who's opining this.
- "has also been seen as a precursor" - By?
- European home cinema releases?
- Modern critical reception... perhaps a better word to clarify what period. If you ask our article, "modern" is fairly inexact.
- "these themes ... represented a fear of personal commitment and featured "a strong sexual undercurrent"." - The themes or film?
- Reception section looks heavy on the quotes.
- I'll started paraphrasing some of these now; before I start, would you consider any of them to be particularly disposable? GRAPPLE X 00:12, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
- That would depend heavily on the writing style. Personally, I'd keep (or trim, but not remove) the really juicy quotes but rephrase the mundane ones. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:18, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
- Have cut down on them; paraphrasing some and trimming others. Let me know if more is required or how the changes stack up. GRAPPLE X 01:08, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
- Looks fair enough. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:15, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
- Have cut down on them; paraphrasing some and trimming others. Let me know if more is required or how the changes stack up. GRAPPLE X 01:08, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
- That would depend heavily on the writing style. Personally, I'd keep (or trim, but not remove) the really juicy quotes but rephrase the mundane ones. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:18, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
- I'll started paraphrasing some of these now; before I start, would you consider any of them to be particularly disposable? GRAPPLE X 00:12, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
That's it from me. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:58, 14 September 2012 (UTC)