Wikipedia talk:Contents/History and events/Intro

Semi-protected edit request on 15 June 2015 edit

<<<draft article removed>>> Archue (talk) 02:59, 15 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi Archue, this is the talk page for discussing improvements to the page Portal:Contents/History and events/Intro. Please make your request at the talk page for the article concerned. Stickee (talk) 04:05, 15 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 27 April 2018 edit

Sahilsoni0710 (talk) 11:29, 27 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
  Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. NiciVampireHeart 12:13, 27 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 27 April 2018 edit

Sahilsoni0710 (talk) 11:32, 27 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
  Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. NiciVampireHeart 12:14, 27 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 20 December 2020 edit

"The 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica stated that "history in the wider sense is all that has happened, not merely all the phenomena of human life, but those of the natural world as well. (is that past, present and future?) It is everything that undergoes change (including time and gravity shifts with magnetisism, or magic, or Godliness or a God effect); and as modern science has shown that there is nothing absolutely static, therefore, the whole universe, and every part of it, has its <own>"hi"story."

My thoughts are: we could add "own" to the explanation above and drop the "hi" very easily .... In 2020, we can diffuse two entities again, so OurStory has a new meaning, as it is an Earth Story, or a Human Language Story (Analemmic) and remove the "hi" based on contemporary context, Gender dispute, or relevance on the perspective of the subject - ie Space & Time & Universe is inanimate and relative, therefore, has it's own non gender "story" .... our prehistory? Context, is royal to create "Our""Story" based on our combined perspectives, not his story against her's, for example .... ;-) Discuss and debate ;-) Michael John Budden (talk) 14:03, 20 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Not done, Wikipedia is not the right place to promote a particular new style of language, we just follow common usage and whatever style of English is already used in an article. – Thjarkur (talk) 14:10, 20 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 23 February 2021 edit

I want to practically edit some contents on this page Ryhym bancey (talk) 11:53, 23 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

I want to practically edit some contents on this page Ryhym bancey (talk) 11:54, 23 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

You'll need to outline exactly what you want to edit and how. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:40, 23 February 2021 (UTC)Reply