Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/Vanderbilt University/Chemical Literature (Spring)

This Course Wikipedia Resources Connect
Questions? Ask us:

contact@wikiedu.org

Course name
Chemical Literature
Institution
Vanderbilt University
Instructor
Tina Qin
Wikipedia Expert
Ian (Wiki Ed)
Subject
Chemistry
Course dates
2018-01-08 00:00:00 UTC – 2018-04-23 23:59:59 UTC
Approximate number of student editors
20


The primary purpose of this course is to assist students in understanding the body of information which constitutes the chemical literature, and in developing the skills required to effectively and efficiently utilize that literature both as students, and ultimately as professional chemists.

Student Assigned Reviewing
Testvandy
Sextonb Particle in a ring User:Jadeizaguirre/sandbox
Jadeizaguirre Fluorine-19 nuclear magnetic resonance User:Denevedr/sandbox
Henry DeGroot Particle in a ring User:Jadeizaguirre/sandbox
Elderjm2 Fluorine-19 nuclear magnetic resonance User:Denevedr/sandbox
Denevedr Particle in a ring User:Jadeizaguirre/sandbox
Paynejl1
Abbysmith561 Fluorine-19 nuclear magnetic resonance User:Denevedr/sandbox

Timeline

Week 1

Course meetings
Wednesday, 10 January 2018

Week 2

Course meetings
Wednesday, 17 January 2018

Week 3

Course meetings
Wednesday, 24 January 2018
Introduction to the Wikipedia project

This page will guide you through the Wikipedia project for your course. To get started, please review the following handouts: 

Get started on Wikipedia

  • Create an account and join this course page, using the enrollment link your instructor sent you.
  •  It's time to dive into Wikipedia. Below, you'll find the first set of online trainings you'll need to take. New modules will appear on this timeline as you get to new milestones. Be sure to check back and complete them! These trainings are required for your course. 
  •  When you finish the trainings, practice by introducing yourself to a classmate on that classmate's Talk page. 

Due: Create an account and join the course page

Week 4

Course meetings
Wednesday, 31 January 2018
Evaluate Wikipedia

It's time to think critically about Wikipedia articles. You'll evaluate a Wikipedia article related to the course and leave suggestions for improving it on the article's Talk page.

  •  Complete the "Evaluating Articles and Sources" training (linked below).
  •  Create a section in your sandbox titled "Article evaluation" where you'll leave notes about your observations and learnings. This is for practice only and will NOT be scored. 
  •  Choose an article on Wikipedia related to your course to read and evaluate. As you read, consider the following questions (but don't feel limited to these): 
    • Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
    • Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
    • Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
    • Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
    •  Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? 
    • Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?

Week 5

Course meetings
Wednesday, 7 February 2018
Add to an article

Familiarize yourself with editing Wikipedia by adding a citation to an article. There are two ways you can do this:

  • Add 1-2 sentences to a course-related article, and cite that statement to a reliable source, as you learned in the online training.
  •  The Citation Hunt tool shows unreferenced statements from articles. First, evaluate whether the statement in question is true! An uncited statement could just be lacking a reference or it could be inaccurate or misleading. Reliable sources on the subject will help you choose whether to add it or correct the statement. 

Week 6

Course meetings
Wednesday, 14 February 2018
Thinking about sources and plagiarism
  • Blog posts and press releases are considered poor sources of reliable information. Why?
  • What are some reasons you might not want to use a company's website as the main source of information about that company?
  • What is the difference between a copyright violation and plagiarism?
  • What are some good techniques to avoid close paraphrasing and plagiarism?


Best practices for working in groups
  • Once your group has a Wikipedia article to work on, make sure everyone in the group is assigned to that article on the Students tab of this course page.
  • Select one group member whose Sandbox space you'll all share to draft your article. (It will be titled something like User:Diderot/sandbox.) Each person should link to that shared Sandbox from their own Sandbox page. A sandbox is like any other page on Wikipedia, and anyone can edit it.
  • Wikipedia doesn't handle multiple people editing from different devices at the same time very well. If you're working together in person, one person should add the work to the Sandbox. If you are all working independently, make small edits and save often to avoid "editing conflicts" with classmates. Make sure that you're logged in under your own Wikipedia account while editing in your classmate's sandbox to ensure your edits are recorded.
  • Don't create a group account for your project. Group accounts are prohibited.


Choose possible topics
  • Review page 6 of your Editing Wikipedia guidebook.
  •  Look up 3-5 potential topics related to the course that you might want to update on Wikipedia. Review the content of the article and check the Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Identify one or two areas from each that you could improve. 
  • Finally, present your choice to your instructor.

Due: Here are some "chemistry stub" articles that you should consider editing. I will also consider your own suggestions. Fill out the Google Doc (Assignment 5, question 5) for your group and article you chose.   

Week 7

Course meetings
Wednesday, 21 February 2018
Finalize your topic / Find your sources
  • On the Students tab, assign your chosen topic to yourself.
  • In your sandbox, write a few sentences about what you plan to contribute to the selected article.
    • Think back to when you did an article critique. What can you add? Post some of your ideas to the article's talk page, too.
    • Compile a list of relevant, reliable books, journal articles, or other sources. Post that bibliography to the talk page of the article you'll be working on, and in your sandbox. Make sure to check in on the Talk page to see if anyone has advice on your bibliography.


Guide(s) for writing articles in your topic area

Chemistry


Draft your article

You've picked a topic and found your sources. Now it's time to start writing.

Creating a new article?

  • Write an outline of that topic in the form of a standard Wikipedia article's "lead section." Write it in your sandbox.
    • A "lead" section is not a traditional introduction. It should summarize, very briefly, what the rest of the article will say in detail. The first paragraph should include important, broad facts about the subject. A good example is Ada Lovelace. See Editing Wikipedia page 9 for more ideas.

Improving an existing article

  •  Identify what's missing from the current form of the article. Think back to the skills you learned while critiquing an article. Make notes for improvement in your sandbox. Keep reading your sources, too, as you prepare to write the body of the article.

Resources: Editing Wikipedia pages 7–9

Due: Everyone starts writing

Week 8

Course meetings
Wednesday, 28 February 2018
Thinking about Wikipedia
  • What do you think of Wikipedia's definition of "neutrality"?
  • What are the impacts and limits of Wikipedia as a source of information?
  • On Wikipedia, all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources. What kinds of sources does this exclude? Can you think of any problems that might create?
  • If Wikipedia was written 100 years ago, how might its content (and contributors) be different? What about 100 years from now?


Expand your draft
  • Keep working on transforming your article into a complete first draft. Get draft ready for peer-review.
  • If you'd like a Wikipedia Expert to review your draft, now is the time! Click the "Get Help" button in your sandbox to request notes.

Week 9

Course meetings
Wednesday, 14 March 2018
Assignment - Finish draft

Continue to expand and improve your work, and format your article.
Draft Due: March 14.


Week 10

Course meetings
Wednesday, 21 March 2018
Peer review and copy edit
  • First, take the "Peer Review" online training.
  •  Select a classmate’s article that you will peer review and copyedit. On the Articles tab, find the article that you want to review. Then in the "My Articles" section of the Home tab, assign it to yourself to review. 
  •  Peer review your classmate's draft. Leave suggestions on the Talk page of the article, or sandbox, that your fellow student is working on. Other editors may be reviewing your work, so look for their comments! Be sure to acknowledge feedback from other Wikipedians. 
  •  As you review, make spelling, grammar, and other adjustments. Pay attention to the tone of the article. Is it encyclopedic?


Peer reviews are complete

Due: Every student has finished reviewing their assigned articles, making sure that every article has been reviewed.


Week 11

Course meetings
Wednesday, 28 March 2018
Respond to your peer review

You probably have some feedback from other students and possibly other Wikipedians. It's time to work with that feedback to improve your article!


  • Read Editing Wikipedia pages 12 and 14.
  •  Return to your draft or article and think about the suggestions. Decide which ones to start implementing. Reach out to your instructor if you have any questions. 


Continue improving your article

Do additional research and writing to make further improvements to your article, based on suggestions and your own critique.

  •  Read Editing Wikipedia page 12 to see how to create links from your article to others, and from other articles to your own. Try to link to 3–5 articles, and link to your article from 2–3 other articles. 
  •  Consider adding an image to your article. Wikipedia has strict rules about what media can be added, so make sure to take Contributing Images and Media Files training before you upload an image. 

Week 12

Course meetings
Wednesday, 4 April 2018
Begin moving your work to Wikipedia

 Once you've made improvements to your article based on peer review feedback, it's time to move your work to Wikipedia proper - the "mainspace." 

Editing an existing article?

  • NEVER copy and paste your draft of an article over the entire article. Instead, edit small sections at a time.
  •  Copy your edits into the article. Make many small edits, saving each time, and leaving an edit summary. Never replace more than one to two sentences without saving! 
  •  Be sure to copy text from your sandbox while the sandbox page is in 'Edit' mode. This ensures that the formatting is transferred correctly. 

Creating a new article?

Week 13

Course meetings
Wednesday, 11 April 2018
Assignment - Final article

It's the final week to develop your article.

  • Read Editing Wikipedia page 15 to review a final check-list before completing your assignment.
  • Don't forget that you can ask for help from your Wikipedia Expert at any time!

Week 14

Course meetings
Wednesday, 18 April 2018
Final presentations

Each group has 15mins to present your work. Powerpoint slides are encouraged but not required.