Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/Indiana University, Bloomington/Representation and the Body (Spring 2018)

This Course Wikipedia Resources Connect
Questions? Ask us:

contact@wikiedu.org

Course name
Representation and the Body
Institution
Indiana University, Bloomington
Instructor
Jennifer Maher
Wikipedia Expert
Shalor (Wiki Ed)
Subject
Gender Studies
Course dates
2018-01-09 00:00:00 UTC – 2018-05-03 23:59:59 UTC
Approximate number of student editors
35


This course explores a variety of Women's and Gender Studies articles and perspectives on the body in culture. Topics to be covered (so far) include race and intersectionality of bodies, disability studies, masculinity, feminist art, brith and reproductive technology, the intersex body, the trans body, fashion and makeover culture.

Student Assigned Reviewing
Mcorningmyers Black women filmmakers
Andhenne Fatal Attraction Maternity clothing, Platform shoe
Iriszhao0619 Disability studies Fatal Attraction, Transfeminism
Msoposky Disability studies Transfeminism, Islamic feminism
Ebrault The Power, Transfeminism
Adnaankins The Power (Alderman novel)
Hannah.pittman95 Fatal Attraction Maternity clothing, Black women filmmakers
Caithurwitz Maternity clothing Corset, Disability studies
Jelcohen Maternity clothing Fat feminism, Platform shoe
Cagrubba Black women filmmakers Islamic feminism, Fat feminism
Paigehutner Disability studies Maternity clothing, Black women filmmakers
Bwolfson95 Naomi Alderman Naomi Alderman, Fat feminism
Hcsamuel Postfeminism Maternity clothing, Naomi Alderman
Msmoksta Islamic feminism
Bmwoodwo Platform shoe Maternity clothing, Postfeminism
Jordynh Islamic feminism Fat feminism, Disability studies
Sarahcohn Black women filmmakers
Jgomeskuehner Platform shoe Islamic feminism, Fatal Attraction
MaxBaker1123 Corset
Lizmeuser Islamic feminism
Kaitlin 121 Transfeminism
C.bernard23 Fat feminism
Elizabeth.allen. Fatal Attraction
Nicrlove Fat feminism
Amjfish Fat feminism Fat feminism
Taylorboswell01 Postfeminism
Tarapark96 Naomi Alderman Transfeminism, Black women filmmakers
Scvalde The Power (Alderman novel) Naomi Alderman, Black women filmmakers
Ansilvern Postfeminism Corset, Maternity clothing
Chilogan Corset
Dresnick95 Transfeminism
Madisonappel Corset
Jtabshier Maternity clothing
Kennedke Naomi Alderman Naomi Alderman, The Power (Alderman novel)
Rodkeys Black women filmmakers, Disability studies, The Power (Alderman novel)
Bilschne Platform shoe

Timeline

Week 3

Course meetings
Tuesday, 23 January 2018   |   Thursday, 25 January 2018
Milestones

Welcome to your Wikipedia project's course timeline. This page will guide you through the Wikipedia project for your course. Be sure to check with your instructor to see if there are other pages you should be following as well.

This page breaks down writing a Wikipedia article into a series of steps, or milestones. These steps include online trainings to help you get started on Wikipedia.

Your course has also been assigned a Wikipedia Expert. Check your Talk page for notes from them. You can also reach them through the "Get Help" button on this page.

To get started, please review the following handouts:

Milestones
  •  Create an account and join this course page, using the enrollment link your instructor sent you. (To avoid hitting Wikipedia's account creation limits, this is best done outside of class. Only 6 new accounts may be created per day from the same IP address.) 
  •  It's time to dive into Wikipedia. Below, you'll find the first set of online trainings you'll need to take. New modules will appear on this timeline as you get to new milestones. Be sure to check back and complete them! Incomplete trainings will be reflected in your grade. 
  •  When you finish the trainings, practice by introducing yourself to a classmate on that classmate’s Talk page. 
  • You will receive one point for completing each training module (for a total of two points by 1-25).
Milestones

This week, everyone should have a Wikipedia account.   (1 point)

Week 4

Course meetings
Tuesday, 30 January 2018   |   Thursday, 1 February 2018
Milestones

 It's time to think critically about Wikipedia articles. You'll evaluate a Wikipedia article related to the course and leave suggestions for improving it on the article's Talk page. 


  • Complete the "Evaluating Articles and Sources" training (linked below).
  •  Create a section in your sandbox titled "Article evaluation" where you'll leave notes about your observations and learnings. 
  • Choose a Wikipedia article, any article, as long as it is NOT the article you have been officially assigned.
  •  As you read, consider the following questions (but don't feel limited to these): 
    • Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
    • Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
    • Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
    • Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
    •  Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? 
    • Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
    •  Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? 
    • How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
    • How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
  •  Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page, minimum three sentences.   Be sure to sign your feedback with four tildes — Kaitlin 121 (talk) 22:33, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Milestones

 Now that you're thinking about what makes a "good" Wikipedia article, consider some additional questions.  Answer the following questions with four sentences each and bring in typed, to class.  


  • Wikipedians often talk about "content gaps." What do you think a content gap is, and what are some possible ways to identify them?
  • What are some reasons a content gap might arise? What are some ways to remedy them?
  • Does it matter who writes Wikipedia?
  • What does it mean to be "unbiased" on Wikipedia? How is that different, or similar, to your own definition of "bias"?

Week 5

Course meetings
Tuesday, 6 February 2018   |   Thursday, 8 February 2018
Milestones

You have been assigned a topic by your instructor.  Check the students tab to make sure you can see your assigned topic next to your username. 


  • Review page 6 of your Editing Wikipedia guidebook.
  • Choose one group member's sandbox that you will all upload this work onto  (see "Best  Practices for Working in Groups" below)
  • In your group sandbox, work together to draft a plan for the growth of your article. What section do you plan to update? What new section do you want to add to the article? Assign one group member a specific section to work on for the rest of the project. 
    • For help, think back to when you did an article critique. What can you add? Post two to three of  your ideas to the article's talk page. 
    • Each group member should find ONE relevant, reliable book, journal article, or other source for the project. Create a section called "bibliography" in your group Sandbox and link to your source from there. 
Milestones

Whether working individually or in a group, familiarize yourself with editing Wikipedia by adding a citation or making a small change  to your article. There are two ways you can do this:


  • Add 1-2 sentences to your article, and cite that statement to a reliable source, as you learned in the online training.

OR 


  • Copyedit your article. Make minor grammatical changes. 


Best practices for working in groups
  • Make sure everyone in the group is assigned to the same Wikipedia article on the Students tab of this course page.
  • Select one group member whose Sandbox space you'll all share to draft your article. Each person should link to that shared Sandbox from their own Sandbox page. A sandbox is like any other page on Wikipedia, and anyone can edit it.
  • Wikipedia doesn't allow multiple people to edit from different devices at the same time. If you're working together in person, one person should add the work to the Sandbox. If you are all working independently, make small edits and save often to avoid "editing conflicts" with classmates. Make sure that you're logged in under your own Wikipedia account while editing in your classmate's sandbox to ensure your edits are recorded.
  • Don't create a group account for your project. Group accounts are prohibited.

Week 6

Course meetings
Tuesday, 13 February 2018   |   Thursday, 15 February 2018
In class - Discussion
Thinking about sources and plagiarism: 2-13
  • Blog posts and press releases are considered poor sources of reliable information. Why?
  • What are some reasons you might not want to use a company's website as the main source of information about that company?
  • What is the difference between a copyright violation and plagiarism?
  • What are some good techniques to avoid close paraphrasing and plagiarism?


Guide(s) for writing articles in your topic area

Biographies

Books

Films

Sociology

Women's Studies

Milestones

Everyone has begun writing their article drafts.

Week 7

Course meetings
Tuesday, 20 February 2018   |   Thursday, 22 February 2018
In class - Discussion
Thinking about Wikipedia
  • What do you think of Wikipedia's definition of "neutrality"?
  • What are the impacts and limits of Wikipedia as a source of information?
  • On Wikipedia, all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources. What kinds of sources does this exclude? Can you think of any problems that might create?
  • If Wikipedia was written 100 years ago, how might its content (and contributors) be different? What about 100 years from now?
Milestones
  • Keep working on transforming your article into a complete first draft. Get draft ready for peer-review.
  • If you'd like a Wikipedia Expert to review your draft, now is the time! Click the "Get Help" button in your sandbox to request notes.

Week 8

Course meetings
Tuesday, 27 February 2018   |   Thursday, 1 March 2018
Milestones
  • First, take the "Peer Review" online training. (1 point)
  •  Select two classmates’ articles that you will peer review and copyedit. On the Articles tab, find the articles that you want to review. Then in the "My Articles" section of the Home tab, assign them to yourself to review. 
  •  Peer review your classmates' drafts. Leave suggestions on the Talk page of the article, or sandbox, that your fellow student is working on. Other editors may be reviewing your work, so look for their comments! Be sure to acknowledge feedback from other Wikipedians. You must include at least four-five sentences in this review for 5 points by 3/1)
  •  As you review, make spelling, grammar, and other adjustments. Pay attention to the tone of the article. Is it encyclopedic? 
Milestones

Every student has finished reviewing their assigned articles, making sure that every article has been reviewed.


You will also have a mid-term this week (Thursday, March 1st, due March 6)

This will be a written take home. 

Week 9

Course meetings
Tuesday, 6 March 2018
Milestones

You probably have some feedback from other students and possibly other Wikipedians. It's time to work with that feedback to improve your article!

  • Read Editing Wikipedia pages 12 and 14.
  • Return to your draft or article and think about the suggestions. Decide which ones to start implementing. Reach out to your instructor or your Wikipedia Expert if you have any questions.

Week 10

Course meetings
Sunday, 11 March 2018
Spring Break

Week 11

Course meetings
Tuesday, 20 March 2018   |   Thursday, 22 March 2018
Milestones

Once you've made improvements to your article based on peer review feedback, it's time to move your work to Wikipedia proper - the "mainspace."

Editing an existing article?

  • NEVER copy and paste your draft of an article over the entire article. Instead, edit small sections at a time.
  • Copy your edits into the article. Make many small edits, saving each time, and leaving an edit summary. Never replace more than one to two sentences without saving!
  • Be sure to copy text from your sandbox while the sandbox page is in 'Edit' mode. This ensures that the formatting is transferred correctly.

Creating a new article?

  • Read Editing Wikipedia page 13, and follow those steps to move your article from your Sandbox to Mainspace.
  • You can also review the [[../../../training/students/sandboxes|Sandboxes and Mainspace]] online training.

Week 12

Course meetings
Tuesday, 27 March 2018   |   Thursday, 29 March 2018
Assignment - Continue improving your article
1 point

Do additional research and writing to make further improvements to your article, based on suggestions and your own critique.

  • Read Editing Wikipedia page 12 to see how to create links from your article to others, and from other articles to your own. Try to link to 3–5 articles, and link to your article from 2–3 other articles.
  • Consider adding an image to your article. Wikipedia has strict rules about what media can be added, so make sure to take Contributing Images and Media Files training before you upload an image.

Week 13

Course meetings
Tuesday, 3 April 2018   |   Thursday, 5 April 2018
Milestones

Continue to expand and improve your work, and format your article to match Wikipedia's tone and standards. Remember to contact your Wikipedia Expert at any time if you need further help!

Week 14

Course meetings
Tuesday, 10 April 2018   |   Thursday, 12 April 2018
Assignment - Final article work posted by Thursday April 12

It's the final week to develop your article.

  • Read Editing Wikipedia page 15 to review a final check-list before completing your assignment.
  • Don't forget that you can ask for help from your Wikipedia Expert at any time!

Week 15

Course meetings
Tuesday, 17 April 2018   |   Thursday, 19 April 2018
Assignment - Reflective essay Due April 19

Write a reflective essay (2–5 pages) on your Wikipedia contributions.

Consider the following questions as you reflect on your Wikipedia assignment:

  • Critiquing articles: What did you learn about Wikipedia during the article evaluation? How did you approach critiquing the article you selected for this assignment? How did you decide what to add to your chosen article?
  • Summarizing your contributions: include a summary of your edits and why you felt they were a valuable addition to the article. How does your article compare to earlier versions?
  • Peer Review: If your class did peer review, include information about the peer review process. What did you contribute in your review of your peers article? What did your peers recommend you change on your article?
  • Feedback: Did you receive feedback from other Wikipedia editors, and if so, how did you respond to and handle that feedback?
  • Wikipedia generally: What did you learn from contributing to Wikipedia? How does a Wikipedia assignment compare to other assignments you've done in the past? How can Wikipedia be used to improve public understanding of our field/your topic? Why is this important?
Milestones

Everyone should have finished all of the work they'll do on Wikipedia, and be ready for grading.


In class - Take Home Final Exam Assigned this Week and due May 3 (Details on syllabus)