Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies/Archives/Inconclusive/2010/May
This is an archive of past discussions about Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
174.100.111.165
- 174.100.111.165 · talk · contribs · block · log · stalk · Robtex · whois · Google · ipcheck · HTTP · geo · rangeblocks · spur · shodan
Reason: Suspicious edits; may have been used by User:45g in order to evade a block. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 15:04, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
174.34.146.27
- 174.34.146.27 · talk · contribs · block · log · stalk · Robtex · whois · Google · ipcheck · HTTP · geo · rangeblocks · spur · shodan
Reason: Suspicious edits; may be a proxy used by User:45g / 92.235.168.144 in order to evade a block. Please note the similarities between 92.235.168.144's remark and 174.34.146.27's remark. Both of them made legal threats on the same sockpuppetry case. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 18:22, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
78.70.215.24
- 78.70.215.24 · talk · contribs · block · log · stalk · Robtex · whois · Google · ipcheck · HTTP · geo · rangeblocks · spur · shodan
Reason: http://www.xroxy.com/proxylist.htm
- {{inconclusive}}, Likely, blocked. -- zzuuzz (talk) 21:49, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
66.176.233.130
- 66.176.233.130 · talk · contribs · block · log · stalk · Robtex · whois · Google · ipcheck · HTTP · geo · rangeblocks · spur · shodan
Reason: http://www.xroxy.com/proxylist.htm
- {{inconclusive}}, Likely, blocked. -- zzuuzz (talk) 21:49, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
173.192.214.163
- 173.192.214.163 · talk · contribs · block · log · stalk · Robtex · whois · Google · ipcheck · HTTP · geo · rangeblocks · spur · shodan
Reason: Per this edit. I suspect the massive vandalism that article has suffered is due to one user abusing a botnet (if I'm reading the edit right), and thus using an open proxy. —Jeremy (v^_^v Dittobori) 07:38, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- {{inconclusive}}, Likely - it's an anonymising proxy on a dedicated web server; not sure if it's open or privately held, but I've re-blocked it anyway. -- zzuuzz (talk) 08:25, 25 May 2010 (UTC)