Wikipedia:WikiProject Writing/Article lists

Main
page
DiscussionParticipantsResourcesEventsOpen
tasks
Translation
task
force
TemplatesAssessmentPopular
pages
Vital articles in need of improvementGeneral articles in need of improvementArticles in need of creation

Vital articles in need of improvement

edit

Vital articles are articles deemed most important to improve to the highest quality standard on Wikipedia (featured article status). There are five levels of vital articles categorized by subject. If you find an article you believe could be vital, check the talk page for a banner that mentions whether the subject is vital or not.

Article How vital? Quality rank Average monthly pageviews
Code switching level-5 vital article C 27,747
Communication level-2 vital article in Society C 78,204
Essay level-4 vital article in Art Start 49,720
Grammar level-3 vital article in Society C 39,356
Literacy level-4 vital article in Society C 21,904
Plagiarism level-4 vital article in Philosophy B 43,465
Rhetoric level-4 vital article in Society B 34,746
Writing level-2 vital article in Society C 26,081


General articles in need of improvement

edit

General articles are articles under the scope of WikiProject Writing that need some work. We encourage you to add articles to this along with a note describing how the article can be improved. This can be as simple as mentioning an award a scholar received or restructuring the article for clarity.

  • Academic writing (underdeveloped, needs citation, narrativizing, not sophisticated in approach)
  • Adult literacy (redirects to adult education with no mention of writing)
  • African-American Vernacular English - paragraph on Social Context > In Education mentions 1974 CCCC statement on Students’ Right to Their Own Language but needs to be updated and developed
  • Author (needs from perspective of teaching, student writer identity)
  • Argument (extensive, but no mention of writing; also, Eurocentric)
  • Argumentation theory (extensive, but no mention of writing; also, Eurocentric)
  • Theodore Baird (only mentioned for his house designed by frank lloyd wright)
  • Basic writing (extensive, but can use revision to meet Wikipedia standards
  • James A. Berlin (lots of stuff listed, but almost no narrative; contributions to field)
  • Charles Bazerman (contributions not well elaborated, add 2018 NCTE James R. Squire Awardee)
  • Patricia Bizzell (lots of stuff listed, but almost no narrative, add 2008 CCCC Exemplar Awardee)
  • Chinese writing (there is an existing page on "Written Chinese," but it does not attend to the rhetorical or compositional aspects of Chinese writing)
  • Code-switching (no discussion of writing)
  • Cognitive rhetoric (short, only marginally relevant)
  • Collaborative writing (from teaching point of view, underdeveloped)
  • Composition (language) (underdeveloped)
  • Composition studies (foregrounds grad programs--lot on l2 and multiculturalism, but just nubs on others. has a bit on centers also has links to be investigated--could use extensive work--place where we would not get much pushback).
  • Conference on College Composition and Communication (limited, mostly a list of sites and official info)
  • Bob Connors (we'll need a disambiguation page for this; following this link gets an amusing result. Who knew?)
  • Copyright Clause (no discussion of intellectual property issues more generally)
  • Edward P.J. Corbett (short, add 1996 CCCC Exemplar Awardee)
  • Decoloniality (this page has a section "contemporary decoloniality" which could include more links to writing-related topics)
  • Drafting (writing) (redirects to Draft document - possibly want to clarify or distinguish the activity from the product)
  • Draft document (surprisingly high-traffic article that until recently was mostly concerned with Strunk & White v. Elbow. Contains promising bulleted list that can easily support refs to empirical articles)
  • Dyslexia (does not consider implications for writing)
  • Ecocomposition (not clear for non-experts, needs parenthetical citations converted to shortened footnotes WP:SRF)
  • Editing [no information on student/self-editing, editing process]
  • Emergent literacy (needs work, this is also important for parents)
  • Essay
  • Foreign language writing aid (computer tools for writing development, from an FL perspective, extensive and curated, but could be linked to L1 correction, checking, advice tools, maybe a parallel entry with x-link)
  • John Gerber (include 1974 NCTE James R. Square Awardee)
  • Jim W. Corder (detailed but is listed for deletion because it lacks sources for statements of notability)
  • Donald H. Graves (short, add 2008 NCTE James R. Squire Awardee)
  • Handwriting (short, may be relevant for emergent literacy, early schooling)
  • Susan Jarratt (short)
  • Journal of Writing Research (could include links to notable awardees)
  • Literacy (very extensive, well curated, but strong tendency to view literacy as reading, though perfunctory mention of writing. Teaching of literacy in particular is reading exclusive. We need to figure out how to make more symmetrical)
  • Literature(could use some revision including consideration of intertextuality, citation and codification processes)
  • Richard Lloyd-Jones (include 1991 CCCC Exemplar Awardee)
  • Andrea Lunsford (short, add 1994 CCCC Exemplar Awardee)
  • Manuscript (missing discussion of drafts)
  • Miles Myers (short, add 2012 NCTE James R. Squire Awardee)
  • National Writing Project (extensive, but needs more documentation)
  • Native American rhetoric
  • Richard Ohmann (include 1993 CCCC Exemplar Awardee, short, not much connection to writing studies)
  • Orthography (could use something on learning to spell, differences in learning different languages, invented spelling; need to enlist early childhood specialist)
  • Peer critique (short, could use much elaboration)
  • Peer review (none on use in class/as pedagogical tool)
  • Plagiarism (extensive, but no discussion of controversies, limitations of detection software, relation to intertextuality nor student learning trajectories of intertextual location and stance)
  • Plagiarism detection (extensive, but no discussion of controversies, limitations of detection software, relation to intertextuality nor student learning trajectories of intertextual location and stance)
  • Prewriting (Part of a whole cluster of "writing process" articles that assume stage-process model as gospel.)
  • Print culture (Severely limited by residual "Great Divide" assumptions. Needs overhaul from someone conversant with text-and-talk literature.)
  • Professional communication (Needs work). Most users will probably be wanting an article more descriptive of communication in professional contexts; this appears to have been drafted as an explanation of the academic discipline of PTC.
  • Reading and writing (extensive but mostly literacy/reading focused, needs more writing, contains nothing on the interaction of reading and writing in the production of texts, pedagogy that combines two, etc.)
  • Reflective writing (short, strange)
  • Revision (nothing on Revision in writing / writing revision)
  • Rhetoric (very uneven representation of facets and cultures / insufficient attention given to writing and rhetoric / could link more explicitly to page on "Composition Studies")
  • Scientific Writing (lacks history of scientific journal articles, variety of contemporary writing, citation of research on history and varieties, general treatment is simplistic)
  • Geneva Smitherman (needs citations, add 1999 CCCC Exemplar Awardee, add 2005 NCTE James R. Squire Awardee)
  • Teaching Writing in the United States (short to mid intro--ok as far as it goes. xrefs a number of approaches including WAC. Checked cross ref to WAC, where there is a very extensive, current, curated article--we should find out who is doing curating and coordinate with them)
  • Technical writing -- high-traffic page (~500/day) coverage of history ok, but tapers off into a list of genres and advice. Needs distributed-cognition and activity-theory insights.
  • White papers (as government and business genre--have reviewed and expanded by business or tech writing person who may also have ideas for other genres)
  • Word processing (material technology)
  • Writer (long list of kinds of writers throughout history and society--promising as far as it goes, but does not deal with teaching issues or student identity as writer issues--should be reviewed and supplemented by someone for NWP perspective)
  • Writer's block (mid-long, but mostly literary accounts, or creative writing advice, with just a bit from comp studies--certainly we should add more comp research)
  • Writing (opening paragraph mostly OK now, but rest of article is preoccupied with history of writing systems)
  • Writing assessment - needs development, a section on contract grading
  • Writing center (substantial, but could be more, also does not seem current)
  • Writing circle (short piece on writer's groups--this could be expanded by looking at grad writers groups/ published writers groups, also commercial support groups., also more engagement from creative writing community)
  • Writing in space (mid-sized piece on kinds of pens that work in zero-gravity, material technology)
  • Writing slate (material technology of slate and where used)
  • Writing studies (currently redirects to composition studies, could be distinguished but realistically the composition studies page likely needs more attention)
  • Writing style (literary only, but has several subsections giving Strunk and White type advice on word choice, etc.)
  • Writer's voice (subsection of Writing Style; literary only, 3 short paragraphs)
  • Written Communication (journal) (short, no discussion of contribution)
  • Kathleen Blake Yancey(mostly on leadership, list of books, short of analysis of contributions, ideas, add 2018 CCCC Exemplar Awardee, add 2019 NCTE James R. Squire Awardee)
  • Art Young (Different Art Young, no entry for Clemson Prof. include 2002 CCCC Exemplar Awardee)
  • Keith Gilyard - 2000 CCCC Chair
  • Life writing - just getting started, no mention of comp/rhet scholarship
  • Elaine Richardson (writer) Faculty page
  • Victor Villanueva (newly created) opportunities to continue adding to "Research Contributions" and "Publications" sections.

Articles in need of creation

edit

Redlinked articles are articles in need of creation on Wikipedia. If you see a topic, figure, concept, etc. that is notable and within our scope but does not exist on Wikipedia yet, please add it to this list along with a short note mentioning a source, award, or anything else that might be used to establish notability.