Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Peer review/Guitar Hero III Mobile

Guitar Hero III Mobile edit

Looking to get input as to at least get this article to B class - I don't think it has enough to quality to GA, but necessary to get the entire Guitar Hero series as a featured topic. --MASEM 15:21, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming that is true, and that this article will not reach GA status, then this article must be merged somewhere. It has already been released, so it needs to be either GA or merged to get your Featured Topic. Your choices are either Guitar Hero III and the main Guitar Hero series article as targets. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 16:50, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I think we'll be able to get a GA on this - ManInBlack found a developer interview that will be able to expand it out enough to get the GA needed, he just hasn't included the details yet. --MASEM 16:54, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Cool, build it up a bit and give me a holler, I'll look at it when it is close to GA status. :) Judgesurreal777 (talk) 21:51, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, as you probably saw, the dev section has been expanded, so at this point, the question is, is there anything else that could be added or improved about this article for a GA? A screenshot may be reasonable, but mobile screens are usually few and far between and from the watermarked ones I've seen, nothing especially "new" about the game is there, so it would fail typical NFC tests. --MASEM 23:12, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, is there any plot or character information? If there is, then there is a big gap. I would just add a bit more detail to the gameplay, development, and reception, perhaps one or two sentences more each to bulk it up. After that, I think a thorough copyedit is what will then separate this from Featured Status (That's right, FA, because if you can add just a bit more, it will be complete, and if it's comprehensive, it can be short). That's the last you need before you go for FAC. Thoughts? Questions?Judgesurreal777 (talk) 20:44, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]