Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2023/September
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
Contents
- 1 Proposals, September 2023
- 1.1 Cyprinidae stubs reorganization
- 1.2 Ranunculaceae stubs
- 1.3 Boraginaceae stubs
- 1.4 Restaurant stubs
- 1.5 Ukraine military stubs
- 1.6 Several stub templates + categories to pull from Category:Japanese dam stubs
- 1.7 Alismatales stubs
- 1.8 European politician stubs
- 1.9 Turkish airline stubs
- 1.10 Moss stubs
Proposals, September 2023
Cyprinidae stubs reorganization
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was create as revised.
Category:Cyprinidae stubs currently has a backlog of 812 pages, and not enough subcategories. Therefore, I propose to reorganize it like this:
Current structure:
- Category:Cyprinidae stubs
New structure:
- Category:Cyprinidae stubs
- Category:Acheilognathinae stubs
- Category:Alburninae stubs
- Category:Barbinae stubs
- Category:Cultrinae stubs
- Category:Cyprininae stubs
- Category:Danioninae stubs
- Category:Gobioninae stubs
- Category:Labeoninae stubs
- Category:Leptobarbinae stubs
- Category:Leuciscinae stubs
- Category:Tincinae stubs
- Category:Squaliobarbinae stubs
- Category:Xenocyprinae stubs
This would involve creating the following categories/templates:
- Category:Alburninae stubs
- Category:Danioninae stubs
- Category:Gobioninae stubs
- Category:Labeobarbus stubs
- Category:Leptobarbinae stubs
- Category:Tincinae stubs
- Category:Squaliobarbinae stubs
- Category:Xenocyprinae stubs
- {{Alburninae-stub}}
- {{Danioninae-stub}}
- {{Gobioninae-stub}}
- {{Leptobarbinae-stub}}
- {{Tincinae-stub}}
- {{Squaliobarbinae-stub}}
- {{Xenocyprinae-stub}}
And deleting these categories/templates:
- Category:Rasborinae stubs (Contents would be recategorized under Category:Danioninae stubs)
- {{Rasborinae-stub}} (maybe)
Andumé (talk) 20:07, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
- Support. And I have just added a suggestion: add Category:Labeobarbus stubs, since {{Labeobarbus-stub}} has ca. 100 stub articles. Best, --Fadesga (talk) 22:29, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
- But: some of the proposed categories are too small, so I would rather not create their corresponding stub categories: Category:Leptobarbinae stubs, Category:Tincinae stubs, Category:Squaliobarbinae stubs, Category:Xenocyprinae stubs. The templates can be created, but stay as part of the Category:Cyprinidae stubs. --Fadesga (talk) 22:40, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
- I agree. TBH after looking into it I would only create Category:Danioninae stubs, Category:Gobioninae stubs, Category:Labeobarbus stubs, {{Danioninae-stub}}, {{Gobioninae-stub}}, and {{Xenocyprinae-stub}}. The others are too small/unclear for it to be necessary. Andumé (talk) 02:45, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
- But: some of the proposed categories are too small, so I would rather not create their corresponding stub categories: Category:Leptobarbinae stubs, Category:Tincinae stubs, Category:Squaliobarbinae stubs, Category:Xenocyprinae stubs. The templates can be created, but stay as part of the Category:Cyprinidae stubs. --Fadesga (talk) 22:40, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Ranunculaceae stubs
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was create.
Hi there. The Category:Ranunculaceae is large, with over 250 existing stubs. So I propose the creation of Category:Ranunculaceae stubs. Best, --Fadesga (talk) 22:02, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Her Pegship (?) 16:19, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Boraginaceae stubs
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was create.
Hi there. The Category:Boraginaceae is large, with over 300 existing stubs. So I propose the creation of Category:Boraginaceae stubs. Best, --Fadesga (talk) 21:28, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Her Pegship (?) 16:19, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Restaurant stubs
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was created.
I propose creation of the following:
- Support. --Fadesga (talk) 12:24, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Ukraine military stubs
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was created.
I was sorting Ukraine stubs lately and noticed several military-related templates that seem redundant, all uperged to Category:Ukraine stubs. I can't find any reference to these being proposed, but I'm certainly willing to give them a chance.
- Ukraine-mil-stub (22 articles)
- Ukrainian-navy-stub (0 articles)
- Ukraine-minesweeper-stub (1 article)
- UGF-stub (23 articles) - Ukrainian Ground Forces
- USG-stub (0 articles) - Ukrainian Sea Guard
- UAF-stub (2 articles) - Ukrainian Air Force
I propose Category:Ukrainian military stubs to contain {{Ukraine-mil-stub}}, as well as an upmerged {{Ukraine-mil-unit-stub}} (which would be assigned to all the articles currently wearing Ukrainian-navy-stub, Ukraine-minesweeper-stub, UGF-stub, USG-stub, and UAF-stub, after which I would propose those unused templates for deletion). Her Pegship (?) 21:55, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
- Support. If you look at this Petcan result, there are some 200 articles that could be tagged as stub. --Fadesga (talk) 01:40, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Several stub templates + categories to pull from Category:Japanese dam stubs
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was create.
I've done some preliminary analysis leading up to this request, which appears in two sections of Category talk:Japanese dam stubs: "Stub sorting - sub-categories - some statistics" and "Stub sorting - sub-categories - using PetScan". I propose creating the following stub templates+categories with the prospective article populations listed below.
- {{Tōhoku region dam stubs}} (241 articles); Tōhoku region is a group of six prefectures on Honshu island. Stub cat would go into Category:Tōhoku region and the source stub category
- {{Kantō region dam stubs}} (136 articles); Kantō region is a group of seven prefectures, including Tokyo, on Honshu island. Stub cat would go into Category:Kantō region and the source stub category
- {{Chūbu region dam stubs}} (344 articles); Chūbu region is a group of nine prefectures on Honshu island. Stub cat would go into Category:Chūbu region and the source stub category
- {{Kansai region dam stubs}} (170 articles); Kansai region is a group of six to ten (?) prefectures on Honshu island. Stub cat would go into Category:Kansai region and the source stub category
- {{Chūgoku region dam stubs}} (200 articles); Chūgoku region is a group of five prefectures on Honshu island. Stub cat would go into Category:Chūgoku region and the source stub category
- {{Shikoku dam stubs}} (149 articles); Shikoku is the smallest of the four main islands of Japan and has four prefectures. Stub cat would go into Category:Shikoku region and the source stub category
- {{Hokkaido dam stubs}} (168 articles); Hokkaido is the second largest island of Japan and has a single prefecture. Stub cat would go into Category:Dams in Hokkaido and the source stub category
- {{Kyushu dam stubs}} (~220 articles); Kyushu is the third largest of Japans five islands and has seven prefectures. Stub cat would go into Category:Kyushu region and the source stub category
The numbers are not 100% aligned between the PetScan results and the original stub cat article count, but they are within a dozen or so articles of each other. Creation and re-stubbing along these lines would effectively de-populate Category:Japanese dam stubs with its ~1,600 stubs into sub-cats of between about 140 and 350 articles each. Thanks for your review and approval. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 20:15, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
- Strong support. The Category:Japanese dam stubs is a very large category indeed. --Fadesga (talk) 22:25, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
- Support Seems reasonable.★Trekker (talk) 00:29, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
- Support with correct template and category format, i.e. {{Tōhoku-dam-stub}}, not {{Tōhoku region dam stubs}} Her Pegship (?) 03:09, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Alismatales stubs
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was create.
Hi there. The Category:Alismatales is very large, with over 100 existing stubs (not yet assigned to a subcategory), in turn part of over 200 stub-category articles. So I propose the creation of Category:Alismatales stubs. Best, --Fadesga (talk) 19:26, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
European politician stubs
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was create.
The following templates from Category:European politician stubs have over 60 transclusions:
- {{Andorra-politician-stub}} (81) + {{Andorra-mayor-stub}} (1) + {{Andorra-diplomat-stub}} (6) = 88 total // Category:Andorran politician stubs
- {{Belarus-politician-stub}} (64) // Category:Belarusian politician stubs
- {{Malta-politician-stub}} (56) + {{Malta-mayor-stub}} (1) + {{Malta-diplomat-stub}} (4) + {{Malta-MEP-stub}} (1) = 62 total // Category:Maltese politician stubs
- {{Montenegro-politician-stub}} (54) + {{Montenegro-mayor-stub}} (4) + {{Montenegro-diplomat-stub}} (2) = 60 total // Category:Montenegrin politician stubs
- {{NorthMacedonia-politician-stub}} (64) // Category:Macedonian politician stubs (Macedonian appears to be the standard use for cat titles)
Cheers. Curbon7 (talk) 05:13, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Support. --Fadesga (talk) 16:08, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Turkish airline stubs
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was create.
Upmerged stub template under Category:European airline stubs and Category:Asian airline stubs. Per speedy creation criterion S2. An incomplete list of stubs can be found at User:I Am Andumé/List of Turkish airline stubs. Andumé (talk) 18:15, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- Support. --Fadesga (talk) 16:08, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Moss stubs
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was create.
The Category:Bryophyte stubs is very large, with over 600 stub articles. It contains {{Moss-stub}} with over 60 stubs so far; and further, the Petscan tool shows that the Category:Mosses has over 600 articles. So I think it would make sense to create the Category:Moss stubs, as a subcategory of Category:Bryophyte stubs. Regards, --Fadesga (talk) 00:53, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Her Pegship (?) 16:12, 6 September 2023 (UTC)