Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2023/July

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting‎ | Proposals‎ | Archive‎ | 2023

Proposals, July 2023

Yemen geo stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created.
Category:Yemen geography stubs has over 800 articles, 134 of which intersect with Category:Taiz Governorate. Permission requested to speedy create {{Taiz-geo-stub}}/Category:Taiz Governorate geography stubs in the same fashion that categories have been created for other governorates. Her Pegship (?) 20:04, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Mines

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created mine-stub.
The mining stubs category has over 600 articles in it, so I propose sub-cats on the order of geographical location - by continent to begin with, i.e.:

Barring that, an alternative would be to just create a {{mine-stub}} / Category:Mine stubs to use on articles about actual mines and leave {{mining-stub}} Category:Mining stubs to cover mining methods, materials, technology, etc. Her Pegship (?) 22:18, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Support Sebbog13 (talk) 17:47, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
maybe not seperating for each continent but instead keeping mining stubs and mine stubs seperate Sebbog13 (talk) 17:49, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1990s American single stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{1990s-US-single-stub}} (edit talk history links # /subpages /doc /doc edit /sbox /sbox diff /test) , currently a redirect to {{1990s-single-stub}}, has 60 transclusions (from A–F; Category:1990s single stubs has more in the rest of the alphabet). I propose the creation of Category:1990s American single stubs, as below. (Does this qualify for speedy creation?) jlwoodwa (talk) 22:50, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

2000s American single stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Create.
{{2000s-US-single-stub}} (edit talk history links # /subpages /doc /doc edit /sbox /sbox diff /test) , currently a redirect to {{2000s-single-stub}}, has 211 transclusions. I propose the creation of Category:2000s American single stubs, in the manner of Category:2000s British single stubs and Category:2000s Japanese single stubs. jlwoodwa (talk) 22:52, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

British single stubs and decades

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was created: no objection within five days. Sahaib (talk) 16:19, 10 July 2023 (UTC) .
1950s British single stubs, 1960s British single stubs, 1970s British single stubs, 1980s British single stubs, 1990s British single stubs, 2000s British single stubs, 2010s British single stubs, 2020s British single stubs

Category:Japanese single stubs, Category:2000s Japanese single stubs and Category:2010s Japanese single stubs were created over ten years ago. Some of the singles categories contain too many articles such as Category:1980s single stubs, Category:1990s single stubs and Category:2000s single stubs. Articles in Category:British songs and Category:Singles by year have 2518 intersections with all stubs. Sahaib (talk) 08:12, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

  • Do you think it would be useful to break it down further, as in Scottish single stubs, English single stubs, etc.? Her Pegship (?) 22:10, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
  • @Pegship:, There is 1766 intersections for English songs, 150 for Scottish songs, 79 for Welsh songs and 35 for songs from Northern Ireland. That adds up to 2030, so there is about 488 stub pages not in any of them, this is probably because they were not categorised properly or they are from a British Overseas Territory or Crown Dependency. Sahaib (talk) 07:13, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals/Archive/2023/July&oldid=1172839606"