Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2010/September

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting‎ | Proposals‎ | Archive‎ | 2010

Proposals, September 2010

Please check how many articles qualify for a stub type before proposing it.

If (after approval) you create a stub type, please be sure to add it to the list of stub types. This page will be archived in its entirety once all discussions have been closed; there is no need to move them to another page.

NEW PROPOSALS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Template {{Caribbean-sport-bio-stub}} already exists. I'd like to elevate this to a category, treating it as a parent category for:

Dawynn (talk) 10:53, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Support As long as you include the following categories.

Waacstats (talk) 12:06, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

I'd like to ask for a split of that last one. Templates already exist for {{CentralAm-athletics-bio-stub}} and {{Caribbean-athletics-bio-stub}}, as well as several individual country stub templates. I'll propose creating ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Central America athletics biography stubs and ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Caribbean athletics biography stubs. Once these are in place and loaded, I'll put in a separate request to delete the existing category. Dawynn (talk) 15:54, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
I'm not sure about the Central American category as only a dozen or so articles use any of the templates that would go there which is why I've never proposed that split before despite thinking that it would be useful (note that when the category was set up it was because that is a region within the IAAF). Waacstats (talk) 20:57, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
Mexico has its own category with 79 -- enough justification for a Central America header. But if the IAAF uses "Central America and Caribbean", I can see keeping the two together. Dawynn (talk) 02:21, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
upmerge template {{Delaware-NRHP-stub}} has passed the 60 mark propose above category, speedy. Waacstats (talk) 12:17, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
UNpmerged template {{US-prison-stub}} has passed the 60 mark, speedy? Waacstats (talk) 12:39, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Upmerged template already exists and has over 100 articles using it, I would also like to change the template from {{Norway-bridge-stub}} to {{Norway-bridge-struct-stub}} to follow the convention of other templates (keeping the original as a redirect for now.) Waacstats (talk) 21:36, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
upmerged tempalte used on 60+ articles already propose speedy the above cat. Waacstats (talk) 21:36, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

American painters, XXth century birth stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was speedy create upmerge templates.
See ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:American painters, 19th century birth stubs and ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:American painters, 20th century birth stubs. There are no century-level templates here, but someone started creating appropriate decade-level upmerge templates that effectively populate these categories. Problem is, the decade categories were not completely created. Asking to build the following upmerge templates.
For American painters, 19th century birth stubs

For American painters, 20th century birth stubs

Probably a little early for the last template. The painters in that case would be at most 20 years old -- a little early for establishing oneself as a noted painter. But I'm up for building it for future use. Dawynn (talk) 13:20, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy support, see no reason for these not to exist, could be created based on original proposal. (I also changed the level of your heading) Waacstats (talk) 16:44, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
At 780 a stich in time proposal

Waacstats (talk) 23:08, 25 September 2010 (UTC) add {{India-rail-station-stub}} - ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Indian railway station stubs mainly fed from ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:India rail stubs. Waacstats (talk) 16:51, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
three upmerged templates have passed 60 propose the following categories:

Waacstats (talk) 23:01, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

{{2000s-pop-punk-album-stub}}, {{2000s-classical-album-stub}}

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Will someone PLEASE make these templates already? I've asked about three times. I will do all the sorting, am not making an account just to do this. The latest post, which was supported, as were ALL THE OTHERS:

"Album stubs are out of control. Here are a few suggestions that should have absolutely no problem hitting 60. I can't make them myself, though, so somebody else please do this. 174.98.251.19 (talk) 13:35, 25 July 2010 (UTC)"

69.134.32.30 (talk) 20:08, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Have created upmerged to 2000s album stubs, when they reach 60 let me know and I'll create the categories. I have also changed the header so that the template doesn't appear here. Waacstats (talk) 22:58, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized I propose the following

Should just about get this below the threshold for now. Waacstats (talk) 20:04, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized already templated by county and no viable counties so I propose

This should pick up enouogh articles to cut the parent down to size as well as the existing St Louis county category. Waacstats (talk) 12:48, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized only subcat that is viable would be

should de oversize this one for now. Waacstats (talk) 20:44, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
The above is broken down by region and then ceremonial county the following all could do with categories

all viable based on current upmerged templates. Waacstats (talk) 14:13, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized and suprised we haven't already got a bio stub so I propose

should put a big hole in this category. Waacstats (talk) 14:13, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
These arachnids are oversized I propose the following

should de oversize this one. Waacstats (talk) 14:13, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
What is it the snakes and spiders oversized anyway the following should clean this up

Waacstats (talk) 14:13, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

I was just coming here to propose this! Anyways, Support. Dana boomer (talk) 18:02, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Christian monastery stubs is newly oversized, mainly because I've just moved 600 UK monasteries there so I propose taking them all out of it again with the above category being fed by {{UK-Christian-monastery-stub}}. This will get it back down to a reasonable size. Waacstats (talk) 12:40, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Myobatrachidae-stub}}. Main ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Myobatrachidae. 72 articles. Dawynn (talk) 19:19, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Arthroleptidae-stub}}. Main ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Arthroleptidae. 82 articles. Dawynn (talk) 19:19, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{Geometrinae-stub}}. Main category: ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Geometrinae. 138 articles to be pulled from the very overlarge ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Geometridae stubs. This will put a dent in the beast, but there's still a long way to go. Dawynn (talk) 12:36, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
OK. I saw this was in need of splitting (900+ articles), so did some work on the main category side first. Broke this down (as best as I could) into subfamilies. Looks like the following are viable:

Dawynn (talk) 19:30, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

{{Spain-monastery-stub}}

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Articles about Christian monasteries in Spain.Starzynka (talk) 15:42, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was move.
Propose move of ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Hemiphractinae stubs to ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Hemiphractidae stubs. See the rationale in main article Hemiphractidae. This group has moved from a Hylidae subfamily to being considered a family of its own. Primary category already moved to ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Hemiphractidae. Dawynn (talk) 12:25, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over a 1000. Subdivision templates already created I think. Dr. Blofeld 18:28, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Support --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 15:26, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
raion templates are already created but none of them reach 50 let alone 60 and there are very view that are not classified so unless someone can find some grouops of regions that we can use I don't see how we can split this up before it gets any worse. Waacstats (talk) 20:08, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
An editor is adding a lot of villages of late. Around 700 stubs and counting. I think the intention is to add all 2800 billages of Albania eventually so a reorganization now would be a good idea. Dr. Blofeld 11:40, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Slovenia, should be viable. Over 80 I think judging by Category:Populated places in the Municipality of Brežice and over 130 judging by Category:Populated places in the Municipality of Krško . Dr. Blofeld 20:14, 3 September 2010 (UTC) I have recently sorted these and was preparing a proposal along similar lines but slightly expanded, here is the list I propose we create which include the two the famous Dr has mentioned above;

Waacstats (talk) 14:04, 4 September 2010 (UTC) Excellent job Waacs in sorting out the Slovenia mess. You've been excellent in sorting this when at one point it seemed impossible to split. Dr. Blofeld 17:46, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Just needed time and a bit of a push. Waacstats (talk) 20:59, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized, we have already stated splitting this by county templates upmerged to regional categories but could do with finishing this to get it back down to a reasonable size. Any objections.Waacstats (talk) 22:08, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Wasn't this proposed about a year ago? I support anyway.. Dr. Blofeld 21:17, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

I think that was when the original split may have been started/phase 2/whatever was done I am hoping to get a little further into this to atleast get it off the oversized list. Waacstats (talk) 14:07, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Oversized and according to catscan a large number relate to Perth so propose a {{Perth-geo-stub}} and matching ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:Perth geography stubs. Waacstats (talk) 22:08, 1 September 2010 (UTC) Support Látches Lets talk! 14:47, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals/Archive/2010/September&oldid=1142556688"