Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools/Assessment/Archive/2011

January 2011

• Cardinal Gibbons School: I have added substantial information compared to what the page looked like before. Please review, offer feedback, and hopefully upgrade to a C or B article.Wberkey (talk) 18:31, 5 January 2011 (UTC) Article held at Start/Low. Improvement continues. LonelyBeacon (talk) 05:39, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
• Brentwood County High School - Not been assesed before, I think it is about time it was as it has been editted quite a bit recently Winnie412ii (talk) 14:08, 16 January 2011 (UTC) Article assessed as Start/Low -- TheAuthor22 (talk) 18:47, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
• Simon_Langton_Grammar_School_for_Boys: Article has progressed since it was last assessed. ModWilson (talk) 16:59, 12 January 2011 (UTC) Assessed Start/Low. Might be Mid-importance with more referencing to confirm some claims/alumni. I would like someone with background in UK schools to look at one note I left on the talk page regarding something I assume to be unencyclopedic.LonelyBeacon (talk) 19:11, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
• Northwestern High School: I would like for this article to be reassessed. Seems like it has been quite some time. The article is still rated as a "Start Class" article, yet, there is significant content that has been added over the years, including recently. The article is still a work in progress. I need to work on more citations for a few areas in the article, but I think the article qualifies for a C-Class to B-Class status, at minimum. Hopefully I'm not reaching too far with that assertion. Also, I think Northwestern's importance rating should qualify for Low- to Mid-Importance. Thanks in advance. Maryland Pride ... a Wikipedia contributor (talk) 02:52, 21 January 2011 (UTC) Done! See comments at Talk:Northwestern High School (Hyattsville, Maryland). Upgraded to "C-class." _WikiMan^One 17:13, 24 January 2011 (UTC

February 2011

• Royal Grammar School, Guildford: This article has undergone a large amount of expansion (increased twofold) since the last assessment. Thanks TheAuthor22 (talk) 18:05, 20 January 2011 (UTC) Bumped up to "C" class ... an expert in UK schools might take a look at this to see if there is a chance this school qualifies for "Top" importance instead of just "High". LonelyBeacon (talk) 03:14, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
• Los Alamos High School: It's been a few years since the last assessment. There have been many improvements, including new sections, reorganization, and updates. My goal is to get this to be a Good Article and I feel like we're close. I'm looking for a little direction to help me get over the edge. Your assistance would be appreciated. Greg Comlish (talk) 22:44, 16 February 2011 (UTC). I just wanted to add that one of the challenges that contributors to this article have faced is the diversity of information that is present at the article. Some of the facts at the article are not elegantly collected into a particular narrative or article flow. Any specific suggestions on improving this would be welcome. Greg Comlish (talk) 23:08, 16 February 2011 (UTC) Assessed C/Mid ... it is very close to "B". LonelyBeacon (talk) 04:03, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
• I have recently changed the ratings for Accra Academy. This request is to determine if the change is justifiable or not.(OSY 20:30, 22 February 2011 (UTC)) Re-assessed as C/High It is close to B, there are a couple of points I have listed on the talk page that need to be addressed. _The Author ²² _[Talk] 10:42, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
• I have done some more work on Montrose Academy. Could it be reassessed? Lcw27 (talk) 02:51, 27 February 2011 (UTC) Assessed as B/High -there are a few suggestions on the talk page for further improvements. _TheAuthor²² _[Talk] 09:18, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
• I have done some more work on Montrose Academy. Could it be reassessed? Lcw27 (talk) 02:51, 27 February 2011 (UTC) Assessed as B/High -there are a few suggestions on the talk page for further improvements. _TheAuthor²² _[Talk] 09:18, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
• Van der Capellen Scholengemeenschap is currently rated start but I believe this is false and it should be considered a stub. I just heavily edited the page because it was very insubstantial. What is left does not qualify for start in my opinion. (This is actually the first time I suggest an article I edited to be assessed down!) -- Eddyspeeder (talk) 12:25, 28 February 2011 (UTC) Done. _TheAuthor²² _[Talk] 16:33, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

March 2011

• A.J. Moore Academy Blue Taboo (talk) 02:07, 17 March 2011 (UTC) Article retained at Start/Low. LonelyBeacon (talk) 13:29, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
• Kinross Wolaroi School. It was last assessed in 2007, it has been improved since then. — Oli ^OR Pyfan! 12:41, 23 March 2011 (UTC) Done! CT Cooper · talk 22:10, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

April 2011

• Cary Academy: I have cleaned up the article substantially and added references, and I believe that it could easily qualify for a C-Class School Article or higher.Qazwsx999 (talk) 22:13, 30 March 2011 (UTC) Assessed by requester after request was placed, however, I have now left additional comments. CT Cooper · talk 16:45, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
• Los Alamos High School: Recently assessed as a solid B; Not expecting that to change, but I am looking for feedback to see what would be required to go beyond. My goal is to get GA by 2012. Greg Comlish (talk) 20:12, 28 March 2011 (UTC) Done! CT Cooper · talk 19:37, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
• I have been working on Penn Manor High School and am hoping it is no longer Start-Class. I intend to continue adding to this article, as well as next updating the district page. As an alumna and current employee, I have access to a good deal of information about the school and district, as well as a personal interest in the subject. However, I strive to maintain a neutral point of view and accept any extra scrutiny that I may receive for being viewed as a SPA. An inherent challenge of maintaining a school district page is vandalism by students or well-intentioned updates by students that are overly promotional and not factually referenced. I know the page needs more references; for example, the sports section needs full citations. I did what I could to remove obvious bias in that section, but as I am not knowledgeable about sports I haven't attempted to edit the section otherwise. I would appreciate any advice, suggestions, and help in editing this page to achieve a high quality article. Thanks! Hard-G-Gillian (talk) 19:34, 20 April 2011 (UTC) Done by me a while ago. CT Cooper · talk 22:13, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

May 2011

• C.B.C. Monkstown, The article has never been assesed. Legiglass (talk) 23:59, 25 April 2011 (UTC) Done! CT Cooper · talk 19:44, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
• Mesivta Birkas Yitzchok. I just finished an overhaul of this article. It started life as a cut-and-paste from a school website. I'm too close to the editing to give an honest assessment. Thank you, Joe407 (talk) 13:03, 1 May 2011 (UTC) Done! CT Cooper · talk 20:14, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
• Richmond Park Academy The article has recently been substantially expanded with historical information about the school's defunct predecessors. KenBailey (talk) 07:38, 15 May 2011 (UTC) Done, now C/Low.Glanis^Talk 10:21, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

June 2011

• Waldegrave School for Girls I have reworked this article, particularly to expand historical information about the school's defunct predecessors but I have also tried to address the issues raised in its initial assessment. I think it is now something more than a stub. Any general tips and guidance would be appreciated before I attempt any more. Thanks. KenBailey (talk) 07:38, 15 May 2011 (UTC) Done, now Start. Glanis^Talk 13:02, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
• Thames Valley Grammar School Probably stub class but would appreciate a second opinion. KenBailey (talk) 07:45, 15 May 2011 (UTC) Done. Stub class. Glanis^Talk 13:02, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
• St. Bees School I've recently revamped this article a bit and would like a second opinion on what needs done. I've tried to add as many cites as I can, especially for alumni etc. but I'm still relying on the school website a bit too much. Airjevans (talk) 13:57, 30 May 2011 (UTC) Done. B Class. Glanis^Talk 13:37, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
• Looking for an assessment on Palisade High School, started as a C, but with recent edits has moved into the B class. I would like some feedback as to what a more accurate assessment might be, as well as what is need to move it up even higher. Mailman9  (talk)  07:14, 2 June 2011 (UTC) Done. Now C-Class please see my comments on the articles talk page. Glanis^Talk 08:29, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
• North High School (Bakersfield, California): I have made several improvements includiung an additional graph and updated all the data and info. Also, All links have been updated and any dead links fixed. It looks to be a solid B rating - to me at least. Done, definitely not B-class, I have bumped up to Start/Low, see my comments on the article talk page. Glanis^Talk 17:09, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
• Someone should kindly assess the article titled Accra Academy.Ontoyinsimon (talk) 22:22, 17 June 2011 (UTC) Done! CT Cooper · talk 16:47, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

July 2011

• Could someone please assess the Villanova College article. Currently a Start since 9 May 2007, but has had a overhaul. Tomcat1998 (talk) 05:32, 2 July 2011 (UTC) Article was already assessed a "C" from another project, and I agree with that assessment, though it is close to a "B". I left suggestions for improvement. LonelyBeacon (talk) 05:54, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

August–October 2011

There were no article assessment requests completed from August to October 2011.

November 2011

• I have just combined several sections on the Xavier College page to improve its readability. Looking at other articles in the "C" category, I have cause to believe that it has improved beyond this. Could someone please assess it and make some suggestions for its continuing improvement? Cheers :) Nworsn (talk) 02:25, 31 October 2011 (UTC) Done! CT Cooper · talk 21:11, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
• I feel that the article on Delhi Public School, Bathinda has improved over the last one year. Could someone see this and suggest for its further improvement? User:Arunbandana User talk:Arunbandana 07:44, 12 November 2011 (UTC) Done! CT Cooper · talk 22:01, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
• Please assess Portora Royal School. Citations have been added in an attempt to confirm the authenticity of the Famous Old Portorans section. An upgrade in the Importance Scale may be in order. Kscott888 (talk) 15:01, 12 November 2011 (UTC) Done! CT Cooper · talk 22:22, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Just a note that these requests have been noted and will be completed shortly. It is good to see some assessment requests after a few months gap. CT Cooper · talk 22:47, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

December 2011

There were no article assessment requests completed in December 2011.