Qworty clean-up

edit

This sub-page is intended for clean-up of the editing performed by Qworty and his sock accounts.

Instructions

edit

Please choose any of the articles that have not been cleared. After you have reviewed Qworty's changes and made any necessary corrections, <s>strike through</s> the entire listed article and diffs; indent a comment underneath indicating that you are done; summarize what action, if any, was needed; sign with 4 tildes ~~~~. To avoid duplicating effort you may want to begin by indenting a comment that you are "working" the selected title. Please use a good edit summary on any article that you edited as a result of these checks to summarize your action.

Note: Edits made by Qworty should not simply be reverted, and unsourced contentious information should not be added back into biographies, especially BLPs. Non-contentious information may be reinstated if no attempt was made to request citations and these should have a {{cn}} tag added.

These reports (now split across 4 pages), cover contributions to 2448 articles by User:Qworty from timestamp 2007-03-11 09:30:41 UTC to timestamp 2013-05-12 00:24:59 UTC and 92 articles edited by socks of his control.

When all articles in a given section are finished, please consider adding {{cot|Section completed ~~~~}} below the section header and {{cob}} below the last article in the section.

All of these reports were generated by Contribution Surveyor at 2013-05-25T20:00:59+00:00 in 0.08 sec.

An observation

edit

It is my belief that most of Qworty's editing not relating to contemporary writers or publishers is largely unproblematic but that his fiddling with author biographies in particular has been sometimes malicious and damaging to the project. Priority should be placed on the author bios, paying particular attention to his "Delete-Unsourced" edit summary rationales, in which he seems to have taken particular glee. Carrite (talk) 17:08, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

edit

Qworty task force participants

edit

Qworty edits

edit
Articles being checked

Articles 1 through 20

edit
Article is alright; Qworty's edits were genuine vandalism reversion. Seth Kellerman (talk) 09:08, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Article is fine. Seth Kellerman (talk) 09:29, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Now deleted. --Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 02:11, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No problems here. Seth Kellerman (talk) 05:00, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This article was one of Qworty's hatchetjobs. User:Lastitem may be a Qworty sock - it added negative material in 2010 [1] that was gradually whittled away, then readded by Qworty in 2012 almost verbatim [2]. However, it seems to be reasonably NPOV right now and none of Qworty's edits currently stand. Seth Kellerman (talk) 04:44, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Disagreed with redirect. - Bilby (talk) 14:47, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Material has since been removed/reverted. - Bilby (talk) 14:47, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Seems ok. - Bilby (talk) 14:47, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
One small cleanup made - if anyone cares to review it, [3] - article is otherwise fine with most of Qworty's edits long since subsumed. Seth Kellerman (talk) 19:27, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This one is well handled by now.--Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 02:11, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Seems to have already been reverted. --Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 02:11, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Had already been reverted - Seth Kellerman (talk) 17:36, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I believe this article is okay - see Talk:John McCain presidential campaign, 2008#Qworty for more. Wasted Time R (talk) 02:00, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Article was/is a puff piece about an author Robert Clark Young apparently liked. I've proposed it for deletion for reasons explained in the PROD nomination. Seth Kellerman (talk) 23:45, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Seth Kellerman (talk) 04:47, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
All since removed. - Bilby (talk) 14:47, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Since removed. Note that I was involved with this dispute at the time. - Bilby (talk) 14:47, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Edit war. Changes since removed. - Bilby (talk) 14:47, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Large scale removal of content. Since fixed. - Bilby (talk) 14:47, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No problems here. Seth Kellerman (talk) 01:35, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Already reverted by Alf. --Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 02:11, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 21 through 40

edit
Done, all POV editing long since subsumed. Seth Kellerman (talk) 18:57, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done, no issues. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 03:09, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nominated for deletion, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A. B. Stoddard. Seth Kellerman (talk) 22:34, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Deletion closed as no consensus; article stubbified. Note that most of the article was unsourced puffery. Seth Kellerman (talk) 00:24, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Qworty removed much content from this article but in this case his edits seem to have been according to policy. No problems. Seth Kellerman (talk) 04:17, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
At AfD Brustopher (talk) 21:10, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Kept, but there is essentially nothing left of the original Quorty version. Mangoe (talk) 17:32, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Article has been almost completely rewritten since these changes. Brustopher (talk) 21:10, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing too bad, article's been heavily rewritten anyway.Brustopher (talk) 21:18, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing too bad, article's been heavily rewritten anyway.Brustopher (talk) 21:18, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
All seems to be alright with this article. HOWEVER, 123.224.94.138 should be investigated as a possible Qworty sockpuppet. 123.224.94.138 very insistently fought to keep material that Qworty introduced. Seth Kellerman (talk) 01:47, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Seth Kellerman (talk) 19:11, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
All edits overwritten.--Brustopher (talk) 21:49, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No real issues in his edits. The article's still a bit of a mess tho. Brustopher (talk) 21:49, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done, no issues. Seth Kellerman (talk) 19:05, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Most of his problematic edits had already been overwritten. Brustopher (talk) 13:23, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done, No violation--My76Strat (talk) 23:05, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Was unsourced editorializing, removed. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 03:05, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done - a potential issue with the article posted to the article's talk page. Seth Kellerman (talk) 03:35, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 41 through 60

edit
Has since been turned into a redirectBrustopher (talk) 13:31, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
All good. Brustopher (talk) 13:31, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oldest edit deprecated, several edits reverted. One long deletion stands, arguably it was peacock material touting who used this self-publishing press. Qworty was a content warrior in attempting to label the subject a "vanity press" rather than a "self-publishing company." The tendentious phrasing does not appear in the article as of today, thus I believe there is no lasting damage resulting from Qworty's editorial participation here. Carrite (talk) 16:13, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 61 through 80

edit

Articles 81 through 100

edit
Deleted. Seth Kellerman (talk) 00:29, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 101 through 120

edit
Deleted. Seth Kellerman (talk) 23:29, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Article was (and still is) a mess, but Qworty's edits were according to policy. Seth Kellerman (talk) 16:21, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Seth Kellerman (talk) 16:24, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Seth Kellerman (talk) 16:24, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done Seth Kellerman (talk) 16:24, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 121 through 140

edit
Fixed [4]. - Seth Kellerman (talk) 23:35, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 141 through 160

edit

Articles 161 through 180

edit

Articles 181 through 200

edit

Articles 201 through 220

edit

Articles 221 through 240

edit

Articles 241 through 260

edit

Articles 261 through 280

edit

Articles 281 through 300

edit

Articles 301 through 320

edit

Articles 321 through 340

edit

Articles 341 through 360

edit

Articles 361 through 380

edit

Articles 381 through 400

edit

Articles 401 through 420

edit

Articles 421 through 440

edit

Articles 441 through 460

edit

Articles 461 through 480

edit

Articles 481 through 500

edit

Articles 501 through 520

edit

Articles 521 through 540

edit

Articles 541 through 560

edit

Articles 561 through 580

edit

Articles 581 through 600

edit

Articles 601 through 620

edit

Articles 621 through 640

edit
  • FYI: There were WP:COI problems with this article (which did not involve Qworty), though rather than simply reverting to the old sourced version, Qworty deleted most of the content. I've essentially reverted to a pre-COI version and incorporated some of the (non-COI) subsequent edits. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 20:17, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 641 through 660

edit

Articles 661 through 680

edit

Articles 681 through 700

edit
All checked, nothing changed. Mangoe (talk) 20:49, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There was one potentially questionable edit here but the section has since been deleted anyway. Mangoe (talk) 20:49, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 701 through 720

edit

Articles 721 through 740

edit

Articles 741 through 760

edit

Articles 761 through 780

edit

Articles 781 through 800

edit

Articles 801 through 820

edit

Articles 821 through 840

edit
all checked; no issues. Mangoe (talk) 13:06, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 841 through 860

edit

Articles 861 through 880

edit
All minor or uncontroversial Mangoe (talk) 20:24, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 881 through 900

edit

Articles 901 through 920

edit
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 13:19, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 13:19, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation, grammar. - Bilby (talk) 13:19, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 13:19, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 13:19, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed some unsourced content. Some since returned. Seems fair enough. - Bilby (talk) 15:17, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Corrected year. - Bilby (talk) 13:29, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Minor copyedits. - Bilby (talk) 13:29, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed a review as COI. Rewrote, expanded and replaced. - Bilby (talk) 15:17, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Minor copyedits. - Bilby (talk) 13:29, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Capitalisation. - Bilby (talk) 13:29, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 13:29, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 14:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 14:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 14:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 14:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 14:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 14:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit, layout. - Bilby (talk) 14:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Capitalisation. - Bilby (talk) 14:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 921 through 940

edit
Removed unsourced content. Subsequently sourced and returned. - Bilby (talk) 07:18, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 07:18, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 07:18, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 07:18, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Capitalization. - Bilby (talk) 09:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 09:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Reorganised list. - Bilby (talk) 09:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedits. Removed some content on reasonable grounds. - Bilby (talk) 09:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Corrected year. - Bilby (talk) 09:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 09:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 09:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Spelling. - Bilby (talk) 09:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 941 through 960

edit
Capitalization. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Capitalization. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Formatting. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Capitalization, punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Changed wikilink. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit, date change. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Tense. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed nn name. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Spelling. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Spelling. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Incorrectly removed name, since reverted. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Spelling. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 961 through 980

edit
Above six all minor grammar/usage fixes. Mangoe (talk) 12:38, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Above six all minor grammar/usage tweaks. Mangoe (talk) 12:34, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 981 through 1000

edit

Articles 1001 through 1020

edit
Section complete. - Bilby (talk) 15:16, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed spaces. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 13:56, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 13:56, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit, removal of content. Seems to have been accepted by other edits, source now used later in the article. Left as is. - Bilby (talk) 15:16, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Reverted vandalism. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 13:56, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 13:56, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 13:56, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 13:56, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Minor correction. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 13:56, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Spelling corrections. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 13:56, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 13:56, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 13:56, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removal of content. Bulk since returned with sources. - Bilby (talk) 15:16, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removal of unsourced content in a BLP. Material has been replaced, still unsourced. Tagged for sources, will revisit to source or clean after some more time has passed. - Bilby (talk) 15:16, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 13:56, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removal of content, some unsourced, some not. Returned most content, minus the overly promotional material, and added sources. Moved to proper title. - Bilby (talk) 15:16, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Update, removal of wikilink. Returned wikilink, as its used seemed consistent. - Bilby (talk) 15:16, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 1021 through 1040

edit
Copyedit, no problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:34, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit, no problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:34, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit, no problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:34, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit, no problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:34, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit, removed spam. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 10:57, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit, no problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:34, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit, no problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:34, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit, no problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:34, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink. Article since recreated, so wikilink returned. - Bilby (talk) 09:34, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit, no problems. - Bilby (talk) 10:57, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit, no problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:34, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink, no problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:34, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink, no problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:34, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink, no problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:34, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed link, text. Returned both. - Bilby (talk) 10:57, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink, no problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:34, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink, no problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:34, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink, no problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:34, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removal of content. Article had sources, but not inline. Returned content that could be sourced. - Bilby (talk) 10:57, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal, no problems. - Bilby (talk) 10:57, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 1041 through 1060

edit
Removal of redlinked names. A bit iffy, but ok. - Bilby (talk) 06:30, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removal of link to subject. Since returned. - Bilby (talk) 06:30, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 06:30, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 06:30, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unwarranted removal of link to author. Returned link. - Bilby (talk) 06:30, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 06:30, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed link to author, seems to be in response to COI edit. Returned the link as it seems useful. - Bilby (talk) 06:09, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removal of redlinks. One wasn't read, but the text has since been removed. - Bilby (talk) 06:09, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed double redirect. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 06:09, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 06:09, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed incorrect link. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 06:09, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 06:09, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Content was removed as unsourced. Returned the bulk of the content, with sources added. - Bilby (talk) 03:10, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink. Article since recreated, link returned. - Bilby (talk) 06:09, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink. Article since recreated and link returned. - Bilby (talk) 06:09, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit, no problems. - Bilby (talk) 06:09, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 1061 through 1080

edit
Removed redlink. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal - incorrect wikilink. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink. No problems, but article since recreated, so I added it back. - Bilby (talk) 09:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedits. A bit POV, perhaps, but ok. - Bilby (talk) 09:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed valid link. Returned. - Bilby (talk) 09:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed valid link. Returned. - Bilby (talk) 09:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink, then name. Name was (properly) returned by another user. - Bilby (talk) 09:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 1081 through 1100

edit
Section complete
Possibly ok at the time. I would add it back, but it is now moot. - Bilby (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedits, but ok. - Bilby (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. - Bilby (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid edit. - Bilby (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid edit. - Bilby (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid edit. - Bilby (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid edits. - Bilby (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
A bit harder. Unexplained removal of a non-redlink. I would put it back, but it is in part of a direct quote, in a way that suggests that it might be best leaving it out. - Bilby (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Some questionable removals, but all since repaired. - Bilby (talk) 15:33, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redlink removal, although link was possibly valid for a different target. Seems ok as a removal, though. -Bilby (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Inappropriate removal of content, since fixed. - Bilby (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 1101 through 1120

edit
Section complete
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 02:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed wikilink. - Bilby (talk) 02:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 02:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 02:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 02:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
A lot had been removed. I've returned some, and raised one section which I think could be ok on the talk page. - Bilby (talk) 01:26, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 02:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 02:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 02:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I returned some of the content that was removed - edit summaries were questionable, and some of the content was viable, if a bit too promotional. Trimmed back and removed promotional language. - Bilby (talk) 02:50, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 02:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 02:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 02:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit, removed extra external links. All seemed ok. - Bilby (talk) 02:24, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid redlink removal, although questionable approach. - Bilby (talk) 02:24, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 02:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed wikilink. - Bilby (talk) 02:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 02:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 02:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 02:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 1121 through 1140

edit
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 14:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 14:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit, removal of external link. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 14:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 14:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 14:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 14:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removal of redlinks. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 14:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removal of redlinks. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 14:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removals were ok overall - mostly promotional text. Some very strange copyvio in the article, that seems to have come from competitor's institutions. - Bilby (talk) 14:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removal of redlinks. Both were correctly removed at the time, although one was to the wrong article. I have restored one, as the correct article now exists. - Bilby (talk) 14:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ugly article. Removed content since returned with better context. - Bilby (talk) 14:43, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 14:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Acceptable removal - content was not needed, and promotional. - Bilby (talk) 14:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed vandalism. - Bilby (talk) 14:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Edits ok. - Bilby (talk) 14:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 14:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 14:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 1141 through 1160

edit
Removed vandalism. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 16:53, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed vandalism. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 16:53, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlinks. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 16:53, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 16:53, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 16:53, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 16:53, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 16:53, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 16:53, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Edits were ok, but needed a reference. Ref added. - Bilby (talk) 16:53, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Mostly ok. I returned the IMDB link, as I think they're useful, but the rest of the edits were ok. - Bilby (talk) 16:53, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 16:53, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Edit summary was questionable, but valid removals. - Bilby (talk) 16:53, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Seems valid. Others have since removed the context, so best left out anyway. - Bilby (talk) 16:53, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Previously reverted. - Bilby (talk) 16:53, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 1161 through 1180

edit
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 11:33, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 11:33, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removal of redlink and name. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 11:33, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removal of redlink and name. A bit iffy, but the name was unsourced, so left removed.. - Bilby (talk) 11:33, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 11:33, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Text removals. Seem fair, made it more neutral. - Bilby (talk) 12:09, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed mention of self-published books. Talk page discussion was in favour of some mention, so I returned the prose coverage and explained on talk, but left out the full list. - Bilby (talk) 12:09, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed name. Not ideal, but seems ok. - Bilby (talk) 12:09, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed name. Not ideal, but seems ok. - Bilby (talk) 12:09, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 11:33, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
NPOV rewording. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 11:33, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 11:33, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Poor removal, but the article has since moved on, so no need to add back. - Bilby (talk) 11:33, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removal of text. Since reverted. - Bilby (talk) 12:09, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 11:33, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ok removal, since added back. - Bilby (talk) 11:33, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removal of unsourced text, removal of bibliography. All since restored. - Bilby (talk) 12:09, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removal of unsourced content, external links. Bulk of the content since returned with sources. No action necessary. - Bilby (talk) 12:09, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 1181 through 1200

edit
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 13:36, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Formatting. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 13:36, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Formatting. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 13:36, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Incorrect removal of link. Now not relevant. - Bilby (talk) 13:36, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Incorrect removal under WP:RED. Article changed, so link no longer relevant. - Bilby (talk) 13:36, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink. Since recreated, but article changed. - Bilby (talk) 13:36, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 13:36, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copy edit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 13:36, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Incorrect removal under WP:RED. Article changed, so link no longer relevant. - Bilby (talk) 13:36, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Incorrect removal under WP:RED. Since returned. - Bilby (talk) 13:36, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 13:36, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink, incorrect link. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 07:36, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed names. Seemed worth adding back, so I did so. - Bilby (talk) 07:36, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 13:36, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Questionable removal under WP:RED. Added back. - Bilby (talk) 13:36, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Incorrect removal under WP:RED. Returned name, but article needs refs, and I'm not sure of the current status of the gallery. - Bilby (talk) 13:36, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 1201 through 1220

edit

Articles 1221 through 1240

edit

Articles 1241 through 1260

edit

Articles 1261 through 1280

edit

Articles 1281 through 1300

edit

Articles 1301 through 1320

edit

Articles 1321 through 1340

edit

Articles 1341 through 1360

edit

Articles 1361 through 1380

edit

Articles 1381 through 1400

edit

Articles 1401 through 1420

edit

Articles 1421 through 1440

edit

Articles 1441 through 1460

edit

Articles 1461 through 1480

edit
Currently being discussed on talk page. --Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 03:03, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 1481 through 1500

edit

Articles 1501 through 1520

edit

Articles 1521 through 1540

edit

Articles 1541 through 1560

edit

Articles 1561 through 1580

edit

Articles 1581 through 1600

edit

Articles 1601 through 1620

edit

Articles 1621 through 1640

edit

Articles 1641 through 1660

edit

Articles 1661 through 1680

edit

Articles 1681 through 1700

edit

Articles 1701 through 1720

edit

Articles 1721 through 1740

edit

Articles 1741 through 1760

edit

Articles 1761 through 1780

edit

Articles 1781 through 1800

edit

* Sara Noxx: (6 edits, 0 major, -81) (-667)(-180)(-81)(-124)(-459)(-231)

Qworty's edits were completely unacceptable, and I fixed them at the time, commenting on the talk page.  The Steve  09:18, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 1801 through 1820

edit

Articles 1821 through 1840

edit

Articles 1841 through 1860

edit

Articles 1861 through 1880

edit

Articles 1881 through 1900

edit

Articles 1901 through 1920

edit

Articles 1921 through 1940

edit

Articles 1941 through 1960

edit

Articles 1961 through 1980

edit

Articles 1981 through 2000

edit

Articles 2001 through 2020

edit
Article reduced to redirect and deleted in 2013. Mangoe (talk) 14:04, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 2021 through 2040

edit
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 07:23, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid. Mangoe (talk) 02:26, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Valid. Mangoe (talk) 02:26, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Already reverted. Mangoe (talk) 02:31, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not a great removal, but seems ok. - Bilby (talk) 11:50, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 11:50, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 11:50, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Returned content, added refs. - Bilby (talk) 11:50, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Returned some content + ref. - Bilby (talk) 11:50, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Reverted and cited. Mangoe (talk) 02:22, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Valid. Mangoe (talk) 02:26, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 2041 through 2060

edit
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 23:40, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Questionable summary, but valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 23:40, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 23:40, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Returned content, formatted. - Bilby (talk) 23:40, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal, some since returned. - Bilby (talk) 23:40, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Partially reverted edit. - Bilby (talk) 23:40, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 23:40, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Previously fixed. - Bilby (talk) 23:40, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Previously fixed. - Bilby (talk) 23:40, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. Mangoe (talk) 02:50, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal - not entirely a necessary one, but the ref wasn't needed, and removing it is ok. - Bilby (talk) 07:17, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not really a valid removal, but the content was duplicated, so it worked out. - Bilby (talk) 22:55, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal, although the reason was less so. - Bilby (talk) 04:35, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. I've put article up for AFD due to lack of notability. Mangoe (talk) 14:00, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 07:17, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 22:55, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Technically all valid. Mangoe (talk) 14:00, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Returned the removed content. - Bilby (talk) 14:58, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid but reverted. I replaced it with current info. Mangoe (talk) 02:50, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 14:58, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 2061 through 2080

edit

Articles 2081 through 2100

edit

Articles 2101 through 2120

edit

Articles 2121 through 2140

edit

Articles 2141 through 2160

edit

Articles 2161 through 2180

edit

Articles 2181 through 2200

edit

Articles 2201 through 2220

edit

Articles 2221 through 2240

edit
Re-instated 1 deletion. Kept the other deletion as it was valid.
No issues. Psychonaut (talk) 07:43, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 2241 through 2260

edit

Articles 2261 through 2280

edit

Articles 2281 through 2300

edit

Articles 2301 through 2320

edit

Articles 2321 through 2340

edit

Articles 2341 through 2360

edit

Articles 2361 through 2380

edit

Articles 2381 through 2400

edit

Articles 2401 through 2420

edit

Articles 2421 through 2440

edit
Section completed-- Mangoe (talk) 16:03, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 2441 through 2448

edit
Done, restored large content removal; information is not contentious therefore specific instances where requested should us the {{cn}} tag; added {{refimprove}} tag--My76Strat (talk) 03:13, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This was reverted already, and some sources added --Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 01:56, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This was reverted already, and sources added --Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 01:56, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Most material already reverted/re-added --Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 01:56, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Most material was already re-added. Much was originally unsourced. --Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 01:56, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removal of massively long plot description. The fanboys added it back. Nothing to see here. --Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 01:56, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Some material already re-added. He removed a huge biography section, that has zero sources (it was perhaps written by someone familiar with the subject). I left a note on the talk page of the article, to leave it up to editors there how to restore the material in a sourced fashion. --Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 02:01, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This was actually counter-vandalism. --Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 01:56, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sock 1 through 20

edit

Sock 21 through 40

edit

Sock 41 through 60

edit
Removed blatant "notable author" self-promotion Catherineyronwode (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Promo edit was already removed. Catherineyronwode (talk) 07:03, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sock 61 through 80

edit

Sock 81 through 92

edit
Finished on June 4, 2013