Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Contributor clean-up/Qworty/Edits 1

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Contributor clean-up‎ | Qworty

Articles 1 through 20 edit

Section complete - Bilby (talk) 14:49, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Article is alright; Qworty's edits were genuine vandalism reversion. Seth Kellerman (talk) 09:08, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Article is fine. Seth Kellerman (talk) 09:29, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Now deleted. --Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 02:11, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No problems here. Seth Kellerman (talk) 05:00, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This article was one of Qworty's hatchetjobs. User:Lastitem may be a Qworty sock - it added negative material in 2010 [1] that was gradually whittled away, then readded by Qworty in 2012 almost verbatim [2]. However, it seems to be reasonably NPOV right now and none of Qworty's edits currently stand. Seth Kellerman (talk) 04:44, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Disagreed with redirect. - Bilby (talk) 14:47, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Material has since been removed/reverted. - Bilby (talk) 14:47, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Seems ok. - Bilby (talk) 14:47, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
One small cleanup made - if anyone cares to review it, [3] - article is otherwise fine with most of Qworty's edits long since subsumed. Seth Kellerman (talk) 19:27, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This one is well handled by now.--Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 02:11, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Seems to have already been reverted. --Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 02:11, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Had already been reverted - Seth Kellerman (talk) 17:36, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I believe this article is okay - see Talk:John McCain presidential campaign, 2008#Qworty for more. Wasted Time R (talk) 02:00, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Article was/is a puff piece about an author Robert Clark Young apparently liked. I've proposed it for deletion for reasons explained in the PROD nomination. Seth Kellerman (talk) 23:45, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Seth Kellerman (talk) 04:47, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
All since removed. - Bilby (talk) 14:47, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Since removed. Note that I was involved with this dispute at the time. - Bilby (talk) 14:47, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Edit war. Changes since removed. - Bilby (talk) 14:47, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Large scale removal of content. Since fixed. - Bilby (talk) 14:47, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No problems here. Seth Kellerman (talk) 01:35, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Already reverted by Alf. --Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 02:11, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 21 through 40 edit

Section complete - Mangoe (talk) 17:34, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done, all POV editing long since subsumed. Seth Kellerman (talk) 18:57, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done, no issues. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 03:09, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nominated for deletion, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A. B. Stoddard. Seth Kellerman (talk) 22:34, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Deletion closed as no consensus; article stubbified. Note that most of the article was unsourced puffery. Seth Kellerman (talk) 00:24, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Qworty removed much content from this article but in this case his edits seem to have been according to policy. No problems. Seth Kellerman (talk) 04:17, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
At AfD Brustopher (talk) 21:10, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Kept, but there is essentially nothing left of the original Quorty version. Mangoe (talk) 17:32, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Article has been almost completely rewritten since these changes. Brustopher (talk) 21:10, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing too bad, article's been heavily rewritten anyway.Brustopher (talk) 21:18, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing too bad, article's been heavily rewritten anyway.Brustopher (talk) 21:18, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
All seems to be alright with this article. HOWEVER, 123.224.94.138 should be investigated as a possible Qworty sockpuppet. 123.224.94.138 very insistently fought to keep material that Qworty introduced. Seth Kellerman (talk) 01:47, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Seth Kellerman (talk) 19:11, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
All edits overwritten.--Brustopher (talk) 21:49, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No real issues in his edits. The article's still a bit of a mess tho. Brustopher (talk) 21:49, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done, no issues. Seth Kellerman (talk) 19:05, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Most of his problematic edits had already been overwritten. Brustopher (talk) 13:23, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done, No violation--My76Strat (talk) 23:05, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Was unsourced editorializing, removed. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 03:05, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done - a potential issue with the article posted to the article's talk page. Seth Kellerman (talk) 03:35, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 41 through 60 edit

Section complete - Seth Kellerman (talk) 09:13, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Has since been turned into a redirectBrustopher (talk) 13:31, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
All good. Brustopher (talk) 13:31, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Problematic edits previously overwritten. Brustopher (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Problematic edits previously overwritten. Brustopher (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • No problems. Qworty's edits were removing genealogical info (which has since been restored) and nominating it for deletion. Seth Kellerman (talk) 08:42, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • No current problems. Most of his editing was copyediting, and the rest of it no longer relevant as the case has been updated. Seth Kellerman (talk) 08:47, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Can't say there's no problems here because it looks like the article has been whitewashed since Qworty's edit, but there are no current Qworty-related problems. Seth Kellerman (talk) 08:49, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Qworty went to war to try and make the article as derogatory as possible, but by now the article is informative and well balanced; none of his edits remain. Seth Kellerman (talk) 09:12, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article seems to be in alright shape at this time. Quorty's edit was a violation of WP:UNDUE, but that error has been fixed over the years. Seth Kellerman (talk) 09:09, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • No problems. A majority of the edits were POV-pushing, but were reverted by others at the time. The last dozen edits were constructive grammatical fixes. Seth Kellerman (talk) 09:03, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • No problems - his edits to this article were generally constructive. Seth Kellerman (talk) 08:46, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Edits were more-or-less harmless original research, and all have been deprecated. Seth Kellerman (talk) 08:38, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Three unproblematic sourced edits from 2008-09, all of which seem to be long deprecated from the article. Carrite (talk) 16:03, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oldest edit deprecated, several edits reverted. One long deletion stands, arguably it was peacock material touting who used this self-publishing press. Qworty was a content warrior in attempting to label the subject a "vanity press" rather than a "self-publishing company." The tendentious phrasing does not appear in the article as of today, thus I believe there is no lasting damage resulting from Qworty's editorial participation here. Carrite (talk) 16:13, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 61 through 80 edit

Section complete - Ceronomus (talk) 02:06, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Qworty nominated it for deletion, the discussion was closed as Keep. Seth Kellerman (talk) 09:19, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Appears to have been legitimate cleanup of promotional language. Seth Kellerman (talk) 09:22, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Clear bias shown by QWORTY, but has already been corrected Ceronomus (talk) 01:37, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • QWORTY edits already fixed by prior editors Ceronomus (talk) 01:50, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Edit was "Afd: Nominated for deletion". Discussion was closed as keep. Ceronomus (talk) 20:28, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Some lingering issues found and fixed Ceronomus (talk) 01:48, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 81 through 100 edit

Deleted. Seth Kellerman (talk) 00:29, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 101 through 120 edit

Section Complete Ceronomus (talk) 02:10, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Edit was "Afd: Nominated for deletion". Discussion was closed as keep. Ceronomus (talk) 02:10, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Done. Unfortunately, most of this content could not be restored because it was primarily OR. Viriditas (talk) 00:59, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Edit was "Afd: Nominated for deletion". Discussion was closed as keep. Ceronomus (talk) 02:10, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Edit was "Afd: Nominated for deletion". Discussion was closed as keep. Ceronomus (talk) 02:10, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Seth Kellerman (talk) 23:29, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Article was (and still is) a mess, but Qworty's edits were according to policy. Seth Kellerman (talk) 16:21, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Edit was "Afd: Nominated for deletion". Discussion was closed as keep. Ceronomus (talk) 02:10, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Edit was "Afd: Nominated for deletion". Discussion was closed as keep. Ceronomus (talk) 02:10, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Edit was "Afd: Nominated for deletion". Discussion was closed as keep. Ceronomus (talk) 02:10, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Seth Kellerman (talk) 16:24, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Seth Kellerman (talk) 16:24, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done Seth Kellerman (talk) 16:24, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 121 through 140 edit

Section completed Ceronomus (talk) 21:34, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Edit is valid and still in place. No problems here. Ceronomus (talk) 20:55, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • AfD: Nominated for deletion, article remains. No issues. Ceronomus (talk) 20:55, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • AfD: Nominated for deletion, article remains. No issues. Ceronomus (talk) 20:55, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • AfD: Nominated for deletion, closed with no consensus. Article still remains. No further issues. Ceronomus (talk) 21:14, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • AfD: Nominated for deletion, article remains. No issues. Ceronomus (talk) 21:14, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • AfD: Nominated for deletion, article remains. No issues. Ceronomus (talk) 21:14, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Original article proposed for deletion by Qworty in 2008 and deleted after its second nomination.Removed 28 Mar 2014 by Scottywong. Ceronomus (talk) 21:14, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • AfD: Nominated for deletion, article remains. No issues. Ceronomus (talk) 21:33, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • AfD: Nominated for deletion, article remains. No issues. Ceronomus (talk) 21:33, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • AfD: Nominated for deletion, article remains. No issues. Ceronomus (talk) 21:33, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • AfD: Nominated for deletion, article remains. No issues. Ceronomus (talk) 21:33, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • AfD: Nominated for deletion, article remains. No issues. Ceronomus (talk) 21:33, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • AfD: Nominated for deletion, article remains. No issues. Ceronomus (talk) 21:33, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • AfD: Nominated for deletion, article remains. No issues. Ceronomus (talk) 21:33, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • AfD: Nominated for deletion, article remains. No issues. Ceronomus (talk) 21:33, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Section about alleged professional misconduct later removed after what looks to have been a frenzied edit war that did not involve Qworty. Ceronomus (talk) 21:33, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed [4]. - Seth Kellerman (talk) 23:35, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 141 through 160 edit

Articles 161 through 180 edit

  • Edited section, "Contemporary forms of tribalism" already removed as speculative. No remaining issues. Ceronomus (talk) 20:31, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 181 through 200 edit

  • All traces of QWORTY's edits long since removed Ceronomus (talk) 01:41, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Edited section (Cultural References) later removed from article. No conflict Ceronomus (talk) 20:20, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Damage by QWORTY repaired by prior editors Ceronomus (talk) 01:40, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 201 through 220 edit

Articles 221 through 240 edit

Articles 241 through 260 edit

Articles 261 through 280 edit

  • No problematic edits made. Page has subsequently greatly evolved anyhow. Ceronomus (talk) 20:39, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 281 through 300 edit

Articles 301 through 320 edit

Articles 321 through 340 edit

Articles 341 through 360 edit

Articles 361 through 380 edit

Articles 381 through 400 edit

Articles 401 through 420 edit

Articles 421 through 440 edit

Articles 441 through 460 edit

Articles 461 through 480 edit

Articles 481 through 500 edit

Articles 501 through 520 edit

Articles 521 through 540 edit

Articles 541 through 560 edit

Articles 561 through 580 edit

Articles 581 through 600 edit

Articles 601 through 620 edit

Articles 621 through 640 edit

  • FYI: There were WP:COI problems with this article (which did not involve Qworty), though rather than simply reverting to the old sourced version, Qworty deleted most of the content. I've essentially reverted to a pre-COI version and incorporated some of the (non-COI) subsequent edits. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 20:17, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 641 through 660 edit

Articles 661 through 680 edit

Articles 681 through 700 edit

All checked, nothing changed. Mangoe (talk) 20:49, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There was one potentially questionable edit here but the section has since been deleted anyway. Mangoe (talk) 20:49, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 701 through 720 edit

Articles 721 through 740 edit

Articles 741 through 760 edit

Articles 761 through 780 edit

Articles 781 through 800 edit

Articles 801 through 820 edit

Articles 821 through 840 edit

all checked; no issues. Mangoe (talk) 13:06, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 841 through 860 edit

Section completed Ceronomus (talk) 18:34, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 861 through 880 edit

All minor or uncontroversial Mangoe (talk) 20:24, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 881 through 900 edit

Articles 901 through 920 edit

Section complete - Bilby (talk) 15:17, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 13:19, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 13:19, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation, grammar. - Bilby (talk) 13:19, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 13:19, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 13:19, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed some unsourced content. Some since returned. Seems fair enough. - Bilby (talk) 15:17, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Corrected year. - Bilby (talk) 13:29, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Minor copyedits. - Bilby (talk) 13:29, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed a review as COI. Rewrote, expanded and replaced. - Bilby (talk) 15:17, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Minor copyedits. - Bilby (talk) 13:29, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Capitalisation. - Bilby (talk) 13:29, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 13:29, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 14:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 14:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 14:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 14:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 14:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 14:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit, layout. - Bilby (talk) 14:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Capitalisation. - Bilby (talk) 14:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 921 through 940 edit

Section complete - Bilby (talk) 09:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed unsourced content. Subsequently sourced and returned. - Bilby (talk) 07:18, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 07:18, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 07:18, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 07:18, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Capitalization. - Bilby (talk) 09:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 09:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Reorganised list. - Bilby (talk) 09:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedits. Removed some content on reasonable grounds. - Bilby (talk) 09:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Corrected year. - Bilby (talk) 09:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 09:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 09:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Spelling. - Bilby (talk) 09:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 941 through 960 edit

Section complete - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Capitalization. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Capitalization. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Formatting. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Capitalization, punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Changed wikilink. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit, date change. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Tense. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed nn name. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Spelling. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Spelling. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Incorrectly removed name, since reverted. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Spelling. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 961 through 980 edit

section completed. Mangoe (talk) 17:48, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Above six all minor grammar/usage fixes. Mangoe (talk) 12:38, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Above six all minor grammar/usage tweaks. Mangoe (talk) 12:34, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 981 through 1000 edit

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Contributor_clean-up/Qworty/Edits_1&oldid=1192172651"