Wikipedia:WikiProject North Carolina/Peer review

MainMembersDiscussionArticle Class, ImportancePeer ReviewRequests/TTDTemplatesResources
WikiProject North Carolina
This WikiProject is about the US state of North Carolina
ShortcutWP:WPNC
Wikimedia CommonsCommons:Category:North Carolina North Carolina
Parent
project(s)
U.S. states
Project banner template{{WikiProject North Carolina}}
Userbox{{User WikiProject North Carolina}}


General guidelines for peer review are found on the Wikipedia:Peer review/guidelines page. This entails putting the {{subst:PR}} on the talk page of the article.

There are other types of peer reviews, including:

When requesting a Good article review, a topic is required. Topics do not include North Carolina, so one of the following topics should be selected:

Agriculture, food and drink  · Art and architecture  · Computing and engineering  · Transport  · Geography  · Places  · World history  · Royalty, nobility and heraldry  · Language and literature  · Mathematics and mathematicians  · Film  · Television  · Media and drama  · Albums  · Songs  · Music  · Biology and medicine  · Chemistry and materials science  · Earth sciences  · Physics and astronomy  · Philosophy and religion  · Culture, sociology and psychology  · Education  · Economics and business  · Law  · Magazines and print journalism  · Politics and government  · Sports and recreation  · Video games  · Warfare

The page Wikipedia:WikiProject North Carolina/Article alerts shows the alerts for North Carolina articles requiring peer review and other actions. It includes the following:

Articles for deletion

(1 more...)

Proposed deletions

Categories for discussion

Good article nominees

Peer reviews

Requested moves

Articles to be merged

Articles to be split

Articles for creation


Draft guidelines for North Carolina Project B Class articles edit

Editors can self-assess articles against the (five B-class criteria listed below) up to and including C-Class. If you have made significant improvements to an article against one or more of B-class criteria and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below, specifying which criteria you have worked on. If you feel unable to assess against one or more of the B-class criteria, please say so when posting. Requests for formal A-Class review should be made at the review department.[note 1]

  • B1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations.
  • B2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies.
  • B3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content.
  • B4. It is free from major grammatical errors.
  • B5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams


Notes:

  1. ^ This draft came from the Military History Project. It is a good starting point for North Carolina guidelines.