Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Peer review/102nd Intelligence Wing/archive 1

102nd Intelligence Wing edit

I've listed this article for peer review because…I want to improve it to FA class, and I want to know what others think I should do to improve it to such. Thanks. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:37, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

YellowMonkey edit

Firstly, Mr P Collin's website had gone dead, but in case you can find an archive, what makes his personal website reliable? YellowMonkey (bananabucket!) 05:50, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually he's redesigned it. I'll update the links now. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:21, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

He keeps a similar history of the wing, so in a way it's more updated then the official history site. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:33, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Buckshot06 edit

You've got a strong list of suggestions in the last A-class review. If you implement all those, starting from 'for technical lineage reasons, all Air National Guard units trace their heritage from a differently numbered group [ie, one of the previous poster's comments about the 318th FG]' and rearrange all the remaining lists as text - do you see many FAs with lists all over the place? - you'll be off to a good start. Put it this way; I achieved two previous FAs by incorporating every comment and suggestion. If you do that, it's very likely you'll get it promoted. Give me a bell if you want some further help. Cheers from Down Under Buckshot06(prof) 04:08, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure of the list part as I don't want to just list things in there. I'll get to what you suggested soon though. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 16:40, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]