Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Webley Revolver/archive1/Archive 1

Webley Revolver edit

Submitting pre-review A-Class article for consideration; no opinion on its quality. Kirill Lokshin 15:00, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose There are some sections that are a little weak on citations, and the organization of the article could probably use som adjustment. Carom 15:39, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Agree on the need for more citations. There are claims and ascertations that need to be cited. I would also call for a rewrite of the intro.--Looper5920 11:20, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I am getting really, really, really sick of people picking holes in this article. Really, I find it quite offensive on a personal level- I've put an awful lot of time and effort into this article, researching it, writing it, and citing it, and all I get is people complaining that it doesn't have enough cites. I'm going to take a deep breath and count to ten, and then I'm going to ask for some more specific information- WHAT needs more cites? WHY does it need more cites? Is anyone else going to help me out here? In the meantime, I'm changing it back to "A-class" since it already went through a peer review process once and everyone was happy with it then, and the two people who objected this time haven't offered anything more substantial (objection-wise) than vague statements about there not being enough cites. --Commander Zulu 13:57, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]