The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Support Quite good. Carom 04:48, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Long, thorough, well-cited, objectively stated but not too dry. LordAmeth 09:52, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks good. On a technical note, some of your sources seem to go to the exact same citation. I would suggest combining them to help reduce the page size. TomStar81 (Talk) 03:33, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good written article. However, I've never heard of it. ;) --Pupster21 13:00, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
