Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Mongol invasions of Vietnam

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

No consensus to promote at this time - Hog Farm (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 16:20, 3 November 2020 (UTC) « Return to A-Class review list[reply]

Mongol invasions of Vietnam edit

Instructions for nominators and reviewers

Nominator(s): Laska666 (talk)

Featured article candidates/Mongol invasions of Vietnam/archive1

I am nominating this article for A-Class review because it now is full covered with well citations. Second it is a important article. Pls review Laska666 (talk) 00:09, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please use a consistent citation style. Half of the article uses sfn refs (which are better imo) and the other half uses footnotes. Pick one. (t · c) buidhe 05:30, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
FYI to any potential reviewers: this was also posted at GAN and FAC. (t · c) buidhe 08:04, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Note that this has been simultaneously listed at GAN, ACR and FAC, I would recommend this closing in favour of the GAN (though I acknowledge there is no rule disallowing a simultaneous GAN/ACR. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 08:06, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, not yet: significant sourcing issues: beyond the inconsistencies mentioned by Buidhe, the article lists Wikipedia as a source, and includes a lot of book sources without page numbers. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 08:06, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. As well as the sourcing issues already identified, I note that several commanders/leader listed in the infobox aren't mentioned elsewhere thus constitutes uncited material. There are likely to be other issues that I wouldn't expect to see in an article going for A or FA class review. This should be closed off so there is only one review in progress, either GA or Peer Review. Zawed (talk) 09:27, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.