The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Following several very helpful peer review assessments, I think this is ready for A-class review. Any and all comments are appreciated. Thanks Buckshot06 16:16, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support — The only changes I'd recommend would be to change the hyphens to emdashes where appropriate and to break the history section down into subsections. As it is right now, it's pretty long.— Preceding unsigned comment added by JKBrooks85 (talk • contribs)
Support - A very good article. Well referenced. Great job Buckshot and Nick. I've done some small changes to the lead. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up® 19:16, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I've probably edited this article too much to be objective, but I think that it easily meets the A-class criteria. Buckshot has done a remarkable job writing such a detailed article on a chaotic institution and has made very good use of the limited sources of information which are available. --Nick Dowling 10:17, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I also think it easily meets all requirements - a little more work and it could be even an FA! --Eurocopter tigre 13:08, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
