Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/List of Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross recipients (V)
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Close as consensus to promote Woody (talk) 16:27, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Nominator(s): MisterBee1966 (talk)
I am nominating this article for A-Class review because of the similarities to the List of Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross recipients (A), which is currently an A-Class article. The layout and structure is derived from the Oak Leaves lists, the majority of which are featured lists. Thanks for the feedback! MisterBee1966 (talk) 07:10, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support on prose per standard disclaimer. - Dank (push to talk) 16:35, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: a few minor fix-it suggestions (otherwise looks fine to me)
- according to the tools: there are no dab links, ext links work (no action required);
- the images appear to be appropriately licenced (no action required);
- the Earwig tool reports no copyright violations online (no action required);
- please check this quotation: "It has to be assumed that a few presentation have been made by the chief of the HPA General Burgdorf in the timeframe 20 April to 30 April." (In this case the word "presentation" should be plural (thus it should be "presentations"), however, if the quoted source makes this error, then it is fine to keep);
- "...12 (12th pioneer battalion) on this picture" (might sound better as "...in this picture");
- please check this here: ""formalities are not 100 percent correct." because the "" (if "because" is meant to be the start of a new sentence, then it should be capitalised). Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 13:42, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - only issue I can see is the overlinking in the list itself of the service of each recipient (e.g. Heer, Kriegsmarine and Luftwaffe etc) and their ranks (e.g. Oberst etc.). Probably should only link each one once in the list per WP:REPEATLINK. Anotherclown (talk) 21:48, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.