Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Italian War of 1542–46
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Italian War of 1542–1546 edit
- My first ever attempt at going through this process, rather than overseeing it. ;-)
I've been working on this article, on and off, for a few months now. As far as the development of the material is concerned, I think it's essentially complete; the only remaining work I foresee is some copyediting. Thus, I think it now meets the requirements for A-Class articles. Comments, of any sort, will be very appreciated! Kirill 02:32, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments
- What exactly are the 'low countries'? The map helps, but article links would be preferable
- The third paragraph in the section "France invaded" contains the line "On 14 July, Henry crossed to Calais and proceeded—carried in a litter—toward Boulogne, where Suffolk was already advancing.[46]" What does "carried in a litter" mean?
- Otherwise, it looks good. Well done. TomStar81 (Talk) 07:07, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I've added some links to Low Countries and litter (vehicle); do you think that's sufficient? Kirill 07:16, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Excellent work. Cla68 (talk) 08:02, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Thats better. I am happy now. TomStar81 (Talk) 08:36, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Great job. Kyriakos (talk) 12:50, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Good work. Woody (talk) 13:20, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Minor, superficial, subjective reservation about one sentence in the section "France invaded" ;-). The sentence "...campaign could not begin, however, until each had resolved the conflicts hanging over them" has an informal tone to it. SoLando (Talk) 20:56, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Excellent job. --Eurocopter tigre (talk) 10:52, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:50, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. I'd have used a much simpler citation style. ie ^ Knecht (1994: 502) instead of ^ Knecht, Renaissance Warrior, 502. and made more use of the multi-cite template, but this is a matter of personal taste, I suppose. --ROGER DAVIES talk 14:42, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- MLA style versus CMS style. ;-) Kirill 14:44, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Indeed. By the way, I wasn't going to say how good this article is because it might appear sycophantic. So I won't :)))--ROGER DAVIES talk
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.